Agricultural Displacement and Deforestation Leakage in the Brazilian Legal Amazon
Abstract
Does environmental policy aiming to reduce deforestation induce displacement of existing agricultural activities? To shed light on this question, we exploit a difference-in-differences strategy with a distance-based treatment to examine whether two policies in the Brazilian Amazon, the Soy Moratorium and the Zero-Deforestation Cattle Agreements, have displaced production or deforestation into neighboring regions. Our results show evidence that the Soy Moratorium induced soy spillovers onto previously cleared land—mainly pasture—in the less regulated ecosystem. The spillovers from the Cattle Agreements, three years after the Soy Moratorium, resulted in increased deforestation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The identification strategy explores a regulatory discontinuity at the Amazon biome border.
“Our identification strategy explores a regulatory discontinuity at the Amazon biome border, which has been used previously by different authors to estimate deforestation reduction impacts of various conservation policies 55,58,59 .”
From Health benefits of reduced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon (2024) · cites this paper as [59]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Health benefits of reduced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Damm, Y., Börner, J., Gerber, N., & Soares-Filho, B. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01840-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moffette, F., & Gibbs, H. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Land Economics
- Publisher
- University of Wisconsin Press
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155-179
- ISSN
- 0023-7639 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-8325
- OpenAlex
- W4401365951
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Land Economics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Conservation and Management
- Keywords
- Legal Amazon, soybean production, cattle ranching, pasture expansion, deforestation policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review