PreprintCited by 1Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular InteractionsProtein Structure and DynamicsMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics with the weighted ensemble method: a hybrid method improves thermodynamics and kinetics sampling

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00770

Abstract

Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD) is a well-established enhanced sampling method for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations that effectively samples the potential energy landscape of the system by adding a boost potential, which smoothens the surface and lowers energy barriers between states. Although equilibrium properties can be recovered exactly in principle, GaMD is unable to give time-dependent properties such as kinetics directly. On the other hand, the weighted ensemble (WE) method can efficiently sample transitions between states with its many weighted trajectories, which directly yield rates and pathways. However, the performance of the WE method (i.e., convergence and efficiency) depends heavily on its initial conditions or initial sampling of the potential energy landscape. Hence, we have developed a hybrid method that combines the two methods, wherein GaMD is first used to sample the potential energy landscape of the system, and the WE method is subsequently used to further sample the potential energy landscape and kinetic properties of interest. We show that the hybrid method can sample both thermodynamic and kinetic properties more accurately and quickly compared to using either method alone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26434/chemrxiv-2021-2j2zr

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ahn, S.-H., Ojha, A., Amaro, R., & McCammon, J.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Published
2021-08-02
OpenAlex
W4253015759
Cited by
1
References
4
Citations by year
2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Funders
National Institutes of Health (GM31749)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
Keywords
Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics, enhanced sampling, potential energy landscape

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review