Cited by 41Career Development and DiversitySTEM EducationScience Education and Pedagogy

Engaging High School Girls in Interdisciplinary STEAM

Open access
STEM Education Futures Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney Australia, Ng, Wan, Fergusson, Jennifer·2020·Science Education International

Abstract

Research into Australian students’ science, technology, engineering, and maths (STEM) engagement has highlighted that there are comparably fewer women enrolling in STEM programs and working in STEM industries. In Australia, males make up 84% of the total population with STEM qualifications, for example, a report in 2015 found only 13% of all engineers in Australia were women. Science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics (STEAM), an approach to STEM education that encourages interdisciplinarity, creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship, is a strategy that has the potential to increase girls’ engagement with STEM. This research investigated the impact of the STEAMpunk Girls Program, funded by the Australian Government, on high school girls’ learning and their teachers’ teaching experiences. The program uses project-learning and design thinking strategies to enable the girls to gain confidence in themselves as change-makers with the capacity to generate solutions to real-world problems. Using a mixed method approach, the findings indicated that teachers and students were positive about the STEAMpunk Girls’ experience, with significant increases in confidence and motivation in the girls at the end of the program.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33828/sei.v31.i3.7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Medium-duration studies of 5-15 weeks demonstrated that integrating DT into STEM education significantly enhanced students' STEM competence, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive engagement.

    “Medium-duration studies (5-15 weeks) demonstrated that integrating DT into STEM education significantly enhanced students'STEM competence, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive engagement (Chang & Yen, 2021;He et al., 2023;Ng & Fergusson, 2020).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
STEM Education Futures Research Centre, U. O. T. S., Ng, W., & Fergusson, J.
Affiliations
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
ORCID
Ng, Wan
Venue
Science Education International
Published
2020-09-01
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
283-294
ISSN
  • 1450-104X (ISSN-L)
  • 2077-2327
OpenAlex
W3082962125
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science education international (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
STEAM education, high school girls, interdisciplinary learning, project-based learning, design thinking, teacher perceptions, student self-confidence, student motivation, gender gap in STEM, women in STEM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review