The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simulated Moments Estimation of Markov Models of Asset Prices
Open accessAbstract
This paper provides a simulated moments estimator (SME) of the parameters of dynamic models in which the state vector follows a time-homogeneous Markov process. Conditions are provided for both weak and strong consistency as well as asymptotic normality. Various tradeoffs among the regularity conditions underlying the large sample properties of the SME are discussed in the context of an asset-pricing model. THIS PAPER PROVIDES CONDITIONS for the consistency and asymptotic normality of a simulated moments estimator (SME) of the parameters of asset-pricing models with time-homogeneous Markov representations of the stochastic forc- ing process. SME's for economic models have been proposed by McFadden (1989) and Pakes and Pollard (1989) for i.i.d. environments, and by Lee and Ingram (1991) for a time series environment. The SME for time series models examined in this paper is as follows. The state vector Yt that determines asset prices is assumed to follow a time-homogeneous Markov process whose transi- tion function depends on an unknown parameter vector 3)0. Asset prices, and possibly other relevant data, are observed as f(Yt, ,0), for some given function f of the underlying state and parameter vector. In parallel, a simulated state process {Y)} is generated (analytically or numerically) from the economic model and corresponding simulated observations f(YJ3, 13) are taken, for a given parameter choice f3. The parameter , is chosen so as to match moments, that is, to minimize the distance between sample moments of the data, f(Y,8030), and those of the simulated series f(Yt/, f3), in a sense to be made precise. The proposed SME extends the generalized method-of-moments (GMM) estimator (Hansen (1982)) to a large class of asset-pricing models for which the moment restrictions of interest do not have analytic representations in terms of observable variables and the unknown parameter vector. We provide conditions on the transition function of Yt and the observation function f under which the SME of 030 is consistent, and characterize the normalized asymptotic distribu- tion of the estimator. For two reasons, neither the regularity conditions underly- ing Hansen's (1982) analysis of GMM estimators for time-series models without
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Forecasting Volatility in Financial Markets: A Review
Poon, S., & Granger, C. W. J. (2003) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/002205103765762743 · Cited by 1,315
ARCH models as diffusion approximations
Nelson, D. B. (1990) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90092-8 · Cited by 938
The econometrics of financial markets
Pagan, A. (1996) · Journal of Empirical Finance · doi:10.1016/0927-5398(95)00020-8 · Cited by 873
Adda, J., Dustmann, C., & Stevens, K. (2017) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/690952 · Cited by 467
Dynamic Models and Structural Estimation in Corporate Finance
Strebulaev, I. A. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Finance · doi:10.1561/0500000035 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Duffie, D., & Singleton, K.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1990-03
- OpenAlex
- W3122053167
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulated Moments Estimation of Markov Models of Asset Prices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/t0087
- The paper
- Duffie, D., & Singleton, K. (1990). Simulated Moments Estimation of Markov Models of Asset Prices. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/t0087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.