The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market: An Exploratory Investigation
Open accessAbstract
The expected return on the market is a number frequently required for the solution of many investment and corporate finance problems.However, by comparison with other financial variables, there has been relatively little academic research on estimating this expected return.The current practice for estimating the expected return on the market is to take the historical average of realized excess returns on the market and add, :It to'the current observed inte're~t: rate.While th;i:smodel does explicitly relfect the dependence of the market experience return ,on the interest rate, it does not take into account the effect of changes in the level of risk associated with the market.Three models of equilibrium expected market returns which do reflect this dependence are analyzed in this paper.Estimation procedures are derived which incorporate the prior restriction that equilibrium expected excess returns on the market must be positive.The parameters of the models are estimated using realized return data for the period 1926-1978.The principal conclusions from this exploratory investigation are: ~irst, in estimating models of the expected return on the market, the nonnegativity restriction of the expected excess return should be explicitly included as part of the specification.Second, estimators which use realized return time series should be adjusted for heteroscadasticity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The pricing of options and corporate liabilities
Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260062 · Cited by 29,074
CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*
Sharpe, W. F. (1964) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x · Cited by 19,441
Cited by
Investor Sentiment Aligned: A Powerful Predictor of Stock Returns
Huang, D., Jiang, F., Tu, J., & Zhou, G. (2015) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhu080 · Cited by 1,123
Time-Varying World Market Integration
Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (1995) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2329414 · Cited by 594
Portfolio Selection with Parameter and Model Uncertainty: A Multi-Prior Approach
Garlappi, L., Wang, T., & Uppal, R. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.671981 · Cited by 264
Bond risk, bond return volatility, and the term structure of interest rates
Viceira, L. M. (2012) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.018 · Cited by 136
Machine Learning Versus Economic Restrictions: Evidence from Stock Return Predictability
Avramov, D., Cheng, S., & Metzker, L. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3450322 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Merton, R.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1980-02
- OpenAlex
- W2135395072
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market: An Exploratory Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w0444
- The paper
- Merton, R. (1980). On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market: An Exploratory Investigation. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w0444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.