The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in a Natural-Rate Model
Open accessAbstract
Natural-rate models suggest that the systematic parts of monetary policy will not have important consequences for the business cycle.Nevertheless, we often observe high and variable rates of monetary growth, and a tendency for monetary authorities to pursue countercyclical policies.This behavior is shown to be consistent with a rational expectations equilibrium in a discretionary environment where the policymaker pursues a ttreasonable objective, but where precommitments on monetary growth are precluded.At each point in time, the policymaker optimizes subject to given inflationary expectations, which determine a Phillips Curve-type tradeoff between monetary growth/inflation and unemployment.Inflationary expectations are formed with the knowledge that policynakers will be in this situation.Accordingly, equilibrium excludes systematic deviations between actual and expected inflation, which means that the equilibrium unemployment rate ends up independent of "policy" in our model.However, the equilibrium rates of monetary growth/inflation depend on various parameters, including the slope of the Phillips Curve, the costs attached to unemployment versus inflation, and the level of the natural unemployment rate.The monetary authority determines an average inflation rate that is "excessive," and also tends to behave countercyclically.Outcomes are shown to improve if a costlessly operating rule is implemented in order to precommit future policy choices in the appropriate manner.The value of these precommitments--that is, of long-ten agreements between the government and the private sector--underlies the argument for rules over discretion.Discretion is the sub-set of rules that provides no guarantees about the government's future behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective
Clarida, R., Galí, J., & Gertler, M. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.37.4.1661 · Cited by 4,916
The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target
Rogoff, K. (1985) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1885679 · Cited by 3,688
Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy
Barro, R. J., & Gordon, D. B. (1983) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(83)90051-x · Cited by 3,610
Self-citationDividend Policy under Asymmetric Information
MILLER, M. H., & ROCK, K. (1985) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb02362.x · Cited by 3,441
Optimal Monetary Policy Inertia
Woodford, M. (1999) · The Manchester School · doi:10.1111/1467-9957.67.s1.1 · Cited by 987
Metadata
- Authors
- Barro, R., & Gordon, D.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1981-11
- OpenAlex
- W3123949599
- Cited by
- 2,177
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in a Natural-Rate Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w0807
- The paper
- Barro, R., & Gordon, D. (1981). A Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in a Natural-Rate Model. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w0807
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.