The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Market Structure and Productivity: A Concrete Example
Open accessAbstract
Many studies have documented large and persistent productivity differences across producers, even within narrowly defined industries.This paper both extends and departs from the past literature, which focused on technological explanations for these differences, by proposing that demand-side features also play a role in creating the observed productivity variation.The specific mechanism investigated here is the effect of spatial substitutability in the product market.When producers are densely clustered in a market, it is easier for consumers to switch between suppliers (making the market in a certain sense more competitive).Relatively inefficient producers find it more difficult to operate profitably as a result.Substitutability increases truncate the productivity distribution from below, resulting in higher minimum and average productivity levels as well as less productivity dispersion.The paper presents a model that makes this process explicit and empirically tests it using data from U.S. ready-mixed concrete plants, taking advantage of geographic variation in substitutability created by the industry's high transport costs.The results support the model's predictions and appear robust.Markets with high demand density for ready-mixed concrete -and thus high concrete plant densities -have higher lower-bound and average productivity levels and exhibit less productivity dispersion among their producers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“A Model of Growth: Through Creative Destruction”
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951599 · Cited by 7,529
The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity
Melitz, M. (2002) · doi:10.3386/w8881 · Cited by 2,996
“Market Structure and Productivity: A Concrete Example”
Syverson, C. (2004) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/424743 · Cited by 683
Self-citation
Cited by
Syverson, C. (2011) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.49.2.326 · Cited by 2,942
Self-citationMeasuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2006) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w12216 · Cited by 1,450
Identifying Agglomeration Spillovers: Evidence from Winners and Losers of Large Plant Openings
Greenstone, M., Hornbeck, R., & Moretti, E. (2010) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/653714 · Cited by 1,138
THE MAGNITUDE AND CAUSES OF AGGLOMERATION ECONOMIES
Puga, D. (2010) · Journal of Regional Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00657.x · Cited by 939
Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory
Card, D., Cardoso, A. R., Heining, J., & Kline, P. (2018) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/694153 · Cited by 919
Metadata
- Authors
- Syverson, C.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2004-05
- OpenAlex
- W2892310196
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 3
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Market Structure and Productivity: A Concrete Example. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w10501
- The paper
- Syverson, C. (2004). Market Structure and Productivity: A Concrete Example. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w10501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.