CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 56Housing Market and EconomicsLocal Government Finance and DecentralizationEconomic and Fiscal Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Property Tax Limitations and Mobility: The Lock-in Effect of California's Proposition 13

Open access
Wasi, Nada, White, Michelle·2005·National Bureau of Economic Research
DOI 10.3386/w11108
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Proposition 13, adopted by California voters in 1978, mandates a property tax rate of one percent, requires that properties be assessed at market value at the time of sale, and allows assessments to rise by no more than 2% per year until the next sale.In this paper, we examine how Prop 13 has affected the average tenure length of owners and renters in California versus in other states.We find that from 1970 to 2000, the average tenure length of owners and renters in California increased by 1.04 years and .79years, respectively, relative to the comparison states.We also find substantial variation in the response to Prop 13, with African-American households responding more than households of other races and migrants responding more than native-born households.Among owner-occupiers, the response to Prop 13 increases sharply as the size of the subsidy rises.Homeowners living in inland California cities such as Bakersfield receive Prop 13 subsidies averaging only $110/year and their average tenure length increased by only .11years in 2000, but owners living in coastal California cities receive Prop 13 subsidies averaging in the thousands of dollars and their average tenure length increased by 2 to 3 years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w11108

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wasi, Nada (2005), "Household mobility within California, quality of life, wages and rents," unpublished chapter of Ph.D. dissertation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 56

Related

Metadata

Authors
Wasi, N., & White, M.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
ORCID
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Publisher
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2005-02
DOI
10.3386/w11108
OpenAlex
W3124248396
Cited by
56
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0212444)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
Keywords
Proposition 13, property tax, housing tenure, homeownership, rental housing, residential mobility, lock-in effect, housing subsidies, racial differences, migrants, California

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review