The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects
Open accessAbstract
This paper empirically assesses the wage effects of the Job Corps program, one of the largest federally-funded job training programs in the United States.Even with the aid of a randomized experiment, the impact of a training program on wages is difficult to study because of sample selection, a pervasive problem in applied micro-econometric research.Wage rates are only observed for those who are employed, and employment status itself may be affected by the training program.This paper develops an intuitive trimming procedure for bounding average treatment effects in the presence of sample selection.In contrast to existing methods, the procedure requires neither exclusion restrictions nor a bounded support for the outcome of interest.Identification results, estimators, and their asymptotic distribution, are presented.The bounds suggest that the program raised wages, consistent with the notion that the Job Corps raises earnings by increasing human capital, rather than solely through encouraging work.The estimator is generally applicable to typical treatment evaluation problems in which there is non-random sample selection/attrition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shadow Prices, Market Wages, and Labor Supply
Heckman, J. (1974) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913937 · Cited by 1,852
Accounting for No-Shows in Experimental Evaluation Designs
Bloom, H. S. (1984) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x8400800205 · Cited by 532
Cited by
From Violence to Voting: War and Political Participation in Uganda
BLATTMAN, C. (2009) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055409090212 · Cited by 898
Cash or Condition? Evidence from a Cash Transfer Experiment
Baird, S., McIntosh, C., & Ozler, B. (2011) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjr032 · Cited by 834
The Consequences of Child Soldiering
Blattman, C., & Annan, J. (2010) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00036 · Cited by 517
Causal inference with observational data
Nichols, A. (2007) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0800700403 · Cited by 339
Baird, S., Chirwa, E., McIntosh, C., & Özler, B. (2010) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1569 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, D.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2005-10
- OpenAlex
- W2152898373
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w11721
- The paper
- Lee, D. (2005). Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w11721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.