The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox
Open accessAbstract
The "Easterlin paradox" suggests that there is no link between a society's economic development and its average level of happiness.We re-assess this paradox analyzing multiple rich datasets spanning many decades.Using recent data on a broader array of countries, we establish a clear positive link between average levels of subjective well-being and GDP per capita across countries, and find no evidence of a satiation point beyond which wealthier countries have no further increases in subjective well-being.We show that the estimated relationship is consistent across many datasets and is similar to the relationship between subject well-being and income observed within countries.Finally, examining the relationship between changes in subjective well-being and income over time within countries we find economic growth associated with rising happiness.Together these findings indicate a clear role for absolute income and a more limited role for relative income comparisons in determining happiness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Взаимосвязь статуса занятости и пола с уровнем психологического благополучия
М.Р., Н., & С.И., Б. (2026) · Cifra LLC Journals · doi:10.60797/irj.2026.170.43 · Cited by 7,950
Constants across cultures in the face and emotion.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0030377 · Cited by 5,509
The Structure of Psychological Well-Being.
Mechanic, D., & Bradburn, N. M. (1970) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2093340 · Cited by 4,923
Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence
EASTERLIN, R. A. (1974) · Nations and Households in Economic Growth · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7 · Cited by 4,474
Happiness: Lessons from a New Science
Cooper, R. N., & Layard, R. (2005) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20031793 · Cited by 4,083
Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533006776526030 · Cited by 3,177
Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles
Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.46.1.95 · Cited by 3,159
Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?
Easterlin, R. A. (1995) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-b · Cited by 3,116
Well-Being Over Time in Britain and the USA
Oswald, A. J., & Blanchflower, D. G. (1999) · Cited by 2,800
Beyond money: toward an economy of well-being
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x · Cited by 2,555
Cited by
Haushofer, J., & Fehr, E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232491 · Cited by 1,638
Inequality at Work: The Effect of Peer Salaries on Job Satisfaction
Card, D., Mas, A., Moretti, E., & Saez, E. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.6.2981 · Cited by 1,045
Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018066 · Cited by 906
Income Inequality and Happiness
Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417262 · Cited by 869
Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation?
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.3.598 · Cited by 497
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2008-08
- OpenAlex
- W3121647019
- Cited by
- 1,072
- References
- 72
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w14282
- The paper
- Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14282
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.