Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,072

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox

Open access
Stevenson, Betsey, Wolfers, Justin·2008·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

The "Easterlin paradox" suggests that there is no link between a society's economic development and its average level of happiness.We re-assess this paradox analyzing multiple rich datasets spanning many decades.Using recent data on a broader array of countries, we establish a clear positive link between average levels of subjective well-being and GDP per capita across countries, and find no evidence of a satiation point beyond which wealthier countries have no further increases in subjective well-being.We show that the estimated relationship is consistent across many datasets and is similar to the relationship between subject well-being and income observed within countries.Finally, examining the relationship between changes in subjective well-being and income over time within countries we find economic growth associated with rising happiness.Together these findings indicate a clear role for absolute income and a more limited role for relative income comparisons in determining happiness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w14282

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Cited by

See all 1,072

Metadata

Authors
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2008-08
OpenAlex
W3121647019
Cited by
1,072
References
72
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w14282
The paper
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14282

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.