Cited by 88Taxation and Compliance StudiesEconomic and Fiscal StudiesFiscal Policy and Economic Growth

Why Can Modern Governments Tax So Much? An Agency Model of Firms as Fiscal Intermediaries

Open access
Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen, Kreiner, Claus Thustrup, Saez, Emmanuel·2009·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

This paper presents a simple agency model to explain why third-party income reporting by employers dramatically improves income tax enforcement.Modern firms have a large number of employees and carry out complex production tasks, which requires the use of accurate business records.Because such records are widely used within the firm, any single employee can denounce collusive tax cheating between employees and the employer by revealing the true records to the government.We show that, if a firm is large enough, such whistleblowing threats will make tax enforcement successful even with low penalties and low audit rates.Embedding this agency model into the standard Allingham-Sandmo tax evasion model, we show that third-party reporting improves tax enforcement if the government disallows self-reported losses or audits such losses more stringently, which fits with actual tax policy practices.We also embed the agency model into a simple macroeconomic growth model where the size of firms grows with exogenous technological progress.In early stages of development, firms are small, tax rates are severely constrained by enforcement, and the size of government is too small.As firm size increases, the enforcement constraint is slackened, and government size is growing.In late stages of development, firm size is sufficiently large to make third-party tax enforcement completely effective and government size is socially optimal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w15218

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Income withholding facilitates cross-checking of tax records between individuals and firms.

    “As Kleven, Kreiner, and Saez (2009) emphasize, income withholding also facilitates cross-checking of tax records between individuals and firms.”

    From Why Do Developing Countries Tax So Little? (2014) · cites this paper as Kleven, Kreiner, and Saez (2009)

  • In a modern economy and with international cooperation, the tax-avoidance elasticity could likely be substantially reduced as most economic transactions, especially at the top end, are recorded and hence verifiable.

    “But in a modern economy and with international cooperation, the tax-avoidance elasticity could likely be substantially reduced as most economic transactions, especially at the top end, are recorded and hence verifiable (Kleven, Kreiner, and Saez 2009).”

    From Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities (2014) · cites this paper as Kleven, Kreiner, and Saez 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kleven, H. J., Kreiner, C. T., & Saez, E.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2009-08
OpenAlex
W2891179434
Cited by
88
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0850631)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Taxation and Compliance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Keywords
tax enforcement, tax evasion, whistleblowing, principal-agent model, Allingham-Sandmo model, audit rates, firm size, government size, economic growth, fiscal intermediaries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review