Cross Sectional Facts for Macroeconomists
Open accessAbstract
This paper provides an introduction to the special issue of the Review of Economic Dynamics on "Cross Sectional Facts for Macroeconomists''.The issue documents, for nine countries, the level and the evolution, over time and over the life cycle, of several dimensions of economic inequality, including wages, labor earnings, income, consumption, and wealth.After describing the motivation and the common methodology underlying this empirical project, we discuss selected results, with an emphasis on cross-country comparisons.Most, but not all, countries experienced substantial increases in wages and earnings inequality, over the last three decades.While the trend in the skill premium differed widely across countries, the experience premium rose and the gender premium fell virtually everywhere.At a higher frequency, earnings inequality appears to be strongly counter-cyclical.In all countries, government redistribution through taxes and transfers reduced the level, the trend and the cyclical fluctuations in income inequality.The rise in income inequality was stronger at the bottom of the distribution.Consumption inequality increased less than disposable income inequality, and tracked the latter much more closely at the top than at the bottom of the distribution.Measuring the age-profile of inequality is challenging because of the interplay of time and cohort effects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blanden, J., Doepke, M., & Stuhler, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29979 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krueger, D., Perri, F., Pistaferri, L., & Violante, G.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2009-12
- OpenAlex
- W2892326411
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
- Keywords
- income inequality, wage inequality, skill premium, gender pay gap, consumption inequality, wealth inequality, life cycle, cross-national comparison, government redistribution, tax and transfer policy, cohort effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review