Cited by 45Income, Poverty, and InequalityLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityEconomic Theory and Policy

Cross Sectional Facts for Macroeconomists

Open access
Krueger, Dirk, Perri, Fabrizio, Pistaferri, Luigi, Violante, Giovanni·2009·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

This paper provides an introduction to the special issue of the Review of Economic Dynamics on "Cross Sectional Facts for Macroeconomists''.The issue documents, for nine countries, the level and the evolution, over time and over the life cycle, of several dimensions of economic inequality, including wages, labor earnings, income, consumption, and wealth.After describing the motivation and the common methodology underlying this empirical project, we discuss selected results, with an emphasis on cross-country comparisons.Most, but not all, countries experienced substantial increases in wages and earnings inequality, over the last three decades.While the trend in the skill premium differed widely across countries, the experience premium rose and the gender premium fell virtually everywhere.At a higher frequency, earnings inequality appears to be strongly counter-cyclical.In all countries, government redistribution through taxes and transfers reduced the level, the trend and the cyclical fluctuations in income inequality.The rise in income inequality was stronger at the bottom of the distribution.Consumption inequality increased less than disposable income inequality, and tracked the latter much more closely at the top than at the bottom of the distribution.Measuring the age-profile of inequality is challenging because of the interplay of time and cohort effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w15554

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krueger, D., Perri, F., Pistaferri, L., & Violante, G.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2009-12
OpenAlex
W2892326411
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
Keywords
income inequality, wage inequality, skill premium, gender pay gap, consumption inequality, wealth inequality, life cycle, cross-national comparison, government redistribution, tax and transfer policy, cohort effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review