The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generalized Social Marginal Welfare Weights for Optimal Tax Theory
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes a new way to evaluate tax reforms, by aggregating losses and gains of different individuals using "generalized social marginal welfare weights."A tax system is optimal if no budget neutral small reform can increase the weighted sum of (money metric) gains and losses across individuals.Optimum tax formulas take the same form as standard welfarist tax formulas by simply substituting standard marginal social welfare weights with those generalized marginal social welfare weights.Weights directly capture society's concerns for fairness allowing us to cleanly separate individual utilities from social weights.Suitable weights can help reconcile discrepancies between the welfarist approach and actual tax practice, as well as unify in an operational way the most prominent alternatives to utilitarianism such as Libertarianism, Equality of Opportunity, or Poverty alleviation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Saez and Stantcheva (2013) develop a systematic optimal tax theory founded on generalized social marginal welfare weights.
“Saez and Stantcheva (2013) develop a systematic optimal tax theory founded on such generalized social marginal welfare weights.”
From Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities (2014) · cites this paper as Saez and Stantcheva (2013)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities
Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2014) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.6.1.230 · Cited by 713
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2013-02
- OpenAlex
- W3123003014
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1156240)
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- Washington Center for Equitable Growth
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Keywords
- optimal taxation, tax reform evaluation, budget neutrality, libertarianism, equal opportunities, poverty reduction, welfare weights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review