Cited by 38Economic and Fiscal StudiesIncome, Poverty, and InequalityFiscal Policy and Economic Growth

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Generalized Social Marginal Welfare Weights for Optimal Tax Theory

Open access
Saez, Emmanuel, Stantcheva, Stefanie·2013·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

This paper proposes a new way to evaluate tax reforms, by aggregating losses and gains of different individuals using "generalized social marginal welfare weights."A tax system is optimal if no budget neutral small reform can increase the weighted sum of (money metric) gains and losses across individuals.Optimum tax formulas take the same form as standard welfarist tax formulas by simply substituting standard marginal social welfare weights with those generalized marginal social welfare weights.Weights directly capture society's concerns for fairness allowing us to cleanly separate individual utilities from social weights.Suitable weights can help reconcile discrepancies between the welfarist approach and actual tax practice, as well as unify in an operational way the most prominent alternatives to utilitarianism such as Libertarianism, Equality of Opportunity, or Poverty alleviation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w18835

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Saez and Stantcheva (2013) develop a systematic optimal tax theory founded on generalized social marginal welfare weights.

    “Saez and Stantcheva (2013) develop a systematic optimal tax theory founded on such generalized social marginal welfare weights.”

    From Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities (2014) · cites this paper as Saez and Stantcheva (2013)

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2013-02
OpenAlex
W3123003014
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1156240)
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • Washington Center for Equitable Growth
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Keywords
optimal taxation, tax reform evaluation, budget neutrality, libertarianism, equal opportunities, poverty reduction, welfare weights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review