The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unions and Inequality Over the Twentieth Century: New Evidence from Survey Data
Abstract
U.S. income inequality has varied inversely with union density over the past hundred years.But moving beyond this aggregate relationship has proven difficult, in part because of limited microdata on union membership prior to 1973.We develop a new source of microdata on union membership dating back to 1936, survey data primarily from Gallup (N ≈ 980,000), to examine the long-run relationship between unions and inequality.We document dramatic changes in the demographics of union members: when density was at its mid-century peak, union households were much less educated and more non-white than other households, whereas pre-World-War-II and today they are more similar to non-union households on these dimensions.However, despite large changes in composition and density since 1936, the household union premium holds relatively steady between ten and twenty log points.We then use our data to examine the effect of unions on income inequality.Using distributional decompositions, time-series regressions, stateyear regressions, as well as a new instrumental-variable strategy based on the 1935 legalization of unions and the World-War-II era War Labor Board, we find consistent evidence that unions reduce inequality, explaining a significant share of the dramatic fall in inequality between the mid-1930s and late 1940s.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205
Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
de Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfœuille, X. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20181169 · Cited by 5,031
Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors
Katz, L. F., & Murphy, K. M. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118323 · Cited by 4,793
Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02410-5 · Cited by 3,799
Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998
Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/00335530360535135 · Cited by 3,769
Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973-1992: A Semiparametric Approach
DiNardo, J., Fortin, N. M., & Lemieux, T. (1996) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2171954 · Cited by 2,903
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (2001) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w8337 · Cited by 2,587
Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Kearney, M. S. (2008) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.90.2.300 · Cited by 2,385
Unconditional Quantile Regressions
(2009) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta6822 · Cited by 2,226
The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms*
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaa004 · Cited by 2,206
Metadata
- Authors
- Farber, H., Herbst, D., Kuziemko, I., & Naidu, S.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2018-05
- OpenAlex
- W2802054570
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 85
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unions and Inequality Over the Twentieth Century: New Evidence from Survey Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w24587
- The paper
- Farber, H., Herbst, D., Kuziemko, I., & Naidu, S. (2018). Unions and Inequality Over the Twentieth Century: New Evidence from Survey Data. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24587
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.