The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Taxation and Innovation in the 20th Century
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“They estimate that, over the twentieth century, the elasticity of the number of inventors residing in a state equals 0.11 for inventors from that state and 1.23 for inventors not from that state.”
From Taxation and Migration: Evidence and Policy Implications (2020) · cites this paper as Akcigit et al. (2018)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“New historical evidence from Akcigit et al. (2018) shows significant effects of taxes on mobility across US states.”
From Taxation and Migration: Evidence and Policy Implications (2020) · cites this paper as Akcigit et al. (2018)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
“A Model of Growth: Through Creative Destruction”
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951599 · Cited by 7,529
The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136099 · Cited by 3,615
A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations
Trajtenberg, M. (1990) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2555502 · Cited by 2,942
Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data
Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2016) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjw004 · Cited by 1,636
Capital is Back: Wealth-Income Ratios in Rich Countries 1700–2010 *
Piketty, T., & Zucman, G. (2014) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju018 · Cited by 1,346
The Elasticity of Taxable Income with Respect to Marginal Tax Rates: A Critical Review
Saez, E., Slemrod, J., & Giertz, S. H. (2012) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.50.1.3 · Cited by 1,302
Do Taxpayers Bunch at Kink Points?
Saez, E. (2010) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.2.3.180 · Cited by 950
Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2007) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/t0335 · Cited by 830
Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth
Mowery, D. C., & Rosenberg, N. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511664441 · Cited by 731
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Notching R&D Investment with Corporate Income Tax Cuts in China
Zhao, C., Liu, Z., Serrato, J. C. S., & Xu, D. Y. (2021) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20191758 · Cited by 463
Understanding Tax Policy: How do People Reason?
Stantcheva, S. (2021) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjab033 · Cited by 363
Self-citationTaxation and Migration: Evidence and Policy Implications
Kleven, H., Landais, C., Muñoz, M., & Stantcheva, S. (2020) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.34.2.119 · Cited by 226
Self-citationAsset Manager Capitalism as a Corporate Governance Regime
Braun, B. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009029841.010 · Cited by 203
Li, J., Wang, X., & Yaping, W. (2020) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2020.08.009 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Akcigit, U., Grigsby, J., Nicholas, T., & Stantcheva, S.
- Affiliations
- Center for Economic and Policy Research (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Akcigit, Ufuk
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2018-09
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2891141919
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Innovation Policy and R&D
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
- Keywords
- taxation, innovation, corporate income tax, personal income tax, patents, inventors, R&D firms, business stealing, agglomeration economies, innovation clusters, tax brackets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review