The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Sticky-Price View of Hoarding
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, as stressed by Hansman et al. (2020), reputable retailers avoid price increases during crises, both due to legal constraints and long run reputational concerns.”
From Consumer panic in the COVID-19 pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as Hansman et al. (2020)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brand and Quantity Choice Dynamics Under Price Uncertainty
Erdem, T., Imai, S., & Keane, M. P. (2003) · Quantitative Marketing and Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1023536326497 · Cited by 331
Cited by
Consumer panic in the COVID-19 pandemic
Keane, M., & Neal, T. (2021) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.045 · Cited by 245
“Furthermore, as stressed by Hansman et al. (2020), reputable retailers avoid price increases during crises, both due to legal constraints and long run reputational concerns.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansman, C., Hong, H., de Paula, Á., & Singh, V.
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2020-04
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Sticky-Price View of Hoarding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w27051
- The paper
- Hansman, C., Hong, H., de Paula, Á., & Singh, V. (2020). A Sticky-Price View of Hoarding. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
