The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
A Simple Mapping from MPCs to MPXs
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using the scaling methodology of Laibson et al. (2022), the model-consistent notional MPC in the quarter following the tax rebate ranges between 7.8 and 11.4%, compared with 15.9-23.4% in the original estimation of Broda and Parker (2014b).
“Using the scaling methodology of Laibson et al. (2022), we estimate that the model-consistent, or 'notional', MPC in the quarter following the tax rebate ranges between 7.8 and 11.4%, compared with 15.9-23.4% in the original estimation of Broda and Parker (2014b).”
From Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation (2024) · cites this paper as Laibson et al. (2022)
Typical estimates of the quarterly MPX for all expenditures range from 50 to 90%, while estimates of the quarterly MPX for non-durable expenditure range from 15 to 25%.
“The estimates based on BP in column 1 are closely in line with the literature: typical estimates of the quarterly MPX for all expenditures range from 50 to 90%, while estimates of the quarterly MPX for non-durable expenditure range from 15 to 25%.”
From Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation (2024) · cites this paper as Laibson et al. (2022)
Using the scaling methodology of Laibson et al. (2022), the model-consistent notional marginal propensity to consume in the quarter following the tax rebate ranges between 7.8% and 11.4%.
“Using the scaling methodology of Laibson et al. (2022), we estimate that the model-consistent, or 'notional,' MPC in the quarter following the tax rebate ranges between 7.8% and 11.4%, compared with 15.9% to 23.4% in the original estimation of Broda and Parker (2014).”
From Revisiting event study designs: robust and efficient estimation (2022) · cites this paper as Laibson et al. (2022)
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Laibson, D., Maxted, P., & Moll, B.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Laibson, David
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2022-01
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205943561
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
- Keywords
- marginal propensity to consume, durable goods, consumption models, real interest rates, model mapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
