Cited by 4Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityEconomic Growth and ProductivityEconomic theories and models

Automation, Learning, and Career Dynamics

Open access
Afrouzi, Hassan, Blanco, Andres, Drenik, Andrés, Hurst, Erik·2026·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

We study how an automating technology affects career dynamics, human capital, and welfare in an economy where workers acquire skill through the tasks they perform.In a continuous-time general equilibrium model, learning-by-doing is determined jointly with the share of tasks automated, the frontier of tasks managers maintain, and the worker-to-manager career transition.Economies with high learning capacity admit pairs of stationary equilibria strictly ranked by the aggregate learning rate.Cheaper technology has opposite effects across the two: in the high-learning equilibrium, it raises welfare through the learning channel itself; in the low-learning equilibrium, it tips the economy into a human-capital trap.The planner's first-best combines a tax on automation profits with a subsidy on frontier-maintenance expenditures at a common rate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w35157

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent research emphasizes that AI disrupts apprenticeship arrangements and the progression from entry-level to experienced work.

    “Recent research emphasizes how these changes disrupt apprenticeship arrangements and the organic progression from entrylevel to experienced work (Garicano and Rayo, 2025; Afrouzi et al., 2026; Catalini et al., 2026; Asriyan et al., 2026).”

    From The Early Impacts of AI on Employment among Recent College Graduates (2026) · cites this paper as Afrouzi et al., 2026

    The Introduction says AI substitutes for entry-level tasks and that AI adoption threatens the pathway through which workers become senior. It also discusses apprenticeship viability, but attributes that specific model to Garicano and Rayo. The source frames disruption as a potential risk rather than an established outcome. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. ACEMOGLU, D. (1996): "A Microfoundation for Social Increasing Returns in Human Capital Accumulation," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3), 779-804.
  2. ACEMOGLU, D., AND D. AUTOR (2011): "Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings," in Handbook of Labor Economics, ed. by O. Ashenfelter, and D. Card, vol. 4B, pp. 1043-1171. Elsevier.
  3. ACEMOGLU, D., AND S. JOHNSON (2024): "Learning from Ricardo and Thompson: Technology, Wages, and Power, Then and Now," Annual Review of Economics, 16, Also available as NBER Working Paper No. 32416.
  4. ACEMOGLU, D., AND P. RESTREPO (2018): "The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment," American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488-1542. (2019): "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3-30. (2020a): "Robots and Employment: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188-2244. (2020b): "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188- 2244. (2022a): "Tasks, Automation, and the Rise in U.S. Wage Inequality," Econometrica, 90(4), 1973-2016. (2022b): "Tasks, Automation, and the Rise in US Wage Inequality," Econometrica, 90(5), 1973-2016.
  5. ANDERSON, J. R. (1982): "Acquisition of Cognitive Skill," Psychological Review, 89(4), 369-406.
  6. ARROW, K. J. (1962a): "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing," Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173. (1962b): "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing," Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173.
  7. AUTOR, D. H. (2015): "Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.
  8. AUTOR, D. H., F. LEVY, AND R. J. MURNANE (2003a): "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279-1333. (2003b): "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279-1333.
  9. BABINA, T., A. FEDYK, A. HE, AND J. HODSON (2024): "Artificial Intelligence, Firm Growth, and Product Innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, 151, 103745.
  10. CAICEDO, S., R. E. LUCAS, AND E. ROSSI-HANSBERG (2019): "Learning, Career Paths, and the Distribution of Wages," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 11(1), 49-88.
  11. CHARI, V. V., AND H. HOPENHAYN (1991): "Vintage Human Capital, Growth, and the Diffusion of New Technology," Journal of Political Economy, 99(6), 1142-1165.
  12. CICCONE, A., AND K. MATSUYAMA (1996): "Start-Up Costs and Pecuniary Externalities as Barriers to Economic Development," Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 33-59.
  13. ERICSSON, K. A., R. T. KRAMPE, AND C. TESCH-RÖMER (1993): "The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance," Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
  14. GALOR, O., AND D. TSIDDON (1997): "The Distribution of Human Capital and Economic Growth," Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 93-124.
  15. GARICANO, L. (2000): "Hierarchies and the Organization of Knowledge in Production," Journal of Political Economy, 108(5), 874-904.
  16. GARICANO, L., AND L. RAYO (2017a): "Relational Knowledge Transfers," American Economic Review, 107(9), 2695- 2730. (2017b): "Relational Knowledge Transfers," American Economic Review, 107(9), 2695-2730. (2025a): "Training in the Age of AI," CEPR Discussion Paper, (20634). (2025b): "Training in the Age of AI: A Theory of Apprenticeship Viability," Discussion Paper 20634, CEPR.
  17. GARICANO, L., AND E. ROSSI-HANSBERG (2006): "Organization and inequality in a knowledge economy," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1383-1435.
  18. GOOS, M., A. MANNING, AND A. SALOMONS (2014): "Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring," American Economic Review, 104(8), 2509-2526.
  19. HASSLER, J., AND J. V. RODRÍGUEZ MORA (2000): "Intelligence, Social Mobility, and Growth," American Economic Review, 90(4), 888-908.
  20. IDE, E. (2025a): "Automation, AI, and the Intergenerational Transmission of Knowledge," arXiv preprint. (2025b): "Automation, AI, and the Intergenerational Transmission of Knowledge," Working paper, IESE Business School, arXiv:2507.16078; CEPR Discussion Paper No. 20940. · arXiv
  21. JOVANOVIC, B., AND Y. NYARKO (1996): "Learning by Doing and the Choice of Technology," Econometrica, 64(6), 1299-1310.
  22. LUCAS, ROBERT E., J. (1988a): "On the Mechanics of Economic Development," Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
  23. LUCAS, R. E. (1988b): "On the Mechanics of Economic Development," Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
  24. LUCAS, R. E., AND B. MOLL (2014): "Knowledge Growth and the Allocation of Time," Journal of Political Economy, 122(1), 1-51.
  25. MOKYR, J., C. VICKERS, AND N. L. ZIEBARTH (2015): "The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 31-50.
  26. REDDING, S. (1996): "The Low-Skill, Low-Quality Trap: Strategic Complementarities between Human Capital and R&D," Economic Journal, 106(435), 458-470.
  27. ROMER, P. M. (1986): "Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
  28. SHEN, J. H., AND A. TAMKIN (2026): "How AI Impacts Skill Formation," arXiv preprint.
  29. STOKEY, N. L. (1988a): "Learning by Doing and the Introduction of New Goods," Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 701-717. (1988b): "Learning by Doing and the Introduction of New Goods," Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 701-717.
  30. YOUNG, A. (1991a): "Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 369-405. (1991b): "Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 369-405. (1993a): "Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing," Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 443-472. (1993b): "Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing," Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 443-472.
  31. ZEIRA, J. (1998): "Workers, Machines, and Economic Growth," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1091-1117.

Cited by

Authors
Afrouzi, H., Blanco, A., Drenik, A., & Hurst, E.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2026-04
OpenAlex
W7160300493
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
Keywords
automation, hands-on learning, career dynamics, human capital, welfare, multiple equilibria, task automation, technology subsidies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review