Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,413

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach

Open access
Ellison, Glenn, Glaeser, Edward·1994·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

This paper discusses the prevalence of Silicon Valley-style localizations of individual manufacturing industries in the United States.Several models in which firms choose locations by throwing darts at a map are used to test whether the degree of localization is greater than would be expected to arise randomly and to motivate a new index of geographic concentration.The proposed index controls for differences in the size distribution of plants and for differences in the size of the geographic areas for which data is available.As a consequence, comparisons of the degree of geographic concentration across industries can be made with more confidence.We reaffirm previous observations in finding that almost all industries are localized, although the degree of localization appears to be slight in about half of the industries in our sample.We explore the nature of agglomerative forces in describing patterns of concentration, the geographic scope of localization, and the extent to which agglomerations involve plants in similar as opposed to identical industries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w4840

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,413

Metadata

Authors
Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
1994-08
OpenAlex
W2889670969
Cited by
1,413
References
0
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w4840
The paper
Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E. (1994). Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4840

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.