The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contagion and Bank Failures During the Great Depression: The June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic
Open accessAbstract
Studies of pre-Depression banking argue that banking panics resulted from depositor confusion about the incidence of shocks, and that interbank cooperation avoided unwarranted failures.The Great Depression --with its concentration of bank failures at particular times and places -has been viewed as an exception.The June 1932 Chicago panic was a dramatic example of a banking panic during the Great Depression.This paper uses individual bank data to address the question of whether solvent Chicago banks failed during the panic as the result of confusion by depositors.Chicago banks are divided into three groups: panic failures, failures outside the panic window, and survivors.The characteristics of these three groups are compared to determine whether the banks that failed during the panic were similar cx ante to those that survived the panic or whether they shared characteristics with other banks that failed.Each categoiy of comparison -the market-to-book value of equity, the estimated probability or failure or duration of survival, the composition of debt, the rates of withdrawal of debt during 1931, and the interest rates paid on debt -leads to the same conclusion: banks that failed during the panic were similar to others that failed and different from survivors.The special attributes of failing banks were distinguishable at least six months before the panic and were reflected in stock prices, failure probabilities, debt composition, and interest rates at least that far in advance.We conclude that failures during the panic reflected relative weakness in the face of common asset value shock rather than contagion.Other evidence points to cooperation among solvent Chicago banks a key factor in avoiding unwarranted bank failures during the panic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The pricing of options and corporate liabilities
Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260062 · Cited by 29,074
Cited by
Systemic Risk, Interbank Relations, and Liquidity Provision by the Central Bank
Freixas, X., Parigi, B. M., & Rochet, J.-C. (2000) · Journal of Money, Credit and Banking · doi:10.2307/2601198 · Cited by 1,379
Bank Governance, Regulation, and Risk Taking
Laeven, L. A., & Levine, R. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1142967 · Cited by 337
Market Contagion: Evidence from the Panics of 1854 and 1857
Kelly, M., & Gráda, C. Ó. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.5.1110 · Cited by 301
Double Liability and Bank Risk Taking
Grossman, R. S. (2001) · Journal of Money, Credit and Banking · doi:10.2307/2673878 · Cited by 117
Gorton, G. (2008) · doi:10.3386/w14398 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Calomiris, C., & Mason, J.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1994-11
- OpenAlex
- W1599733345
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contagion and Bank Failures During the Great Depression: The June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w4934
- The paper
- Calomiris, C., & Mason, J. (1994). Contagion and Bank Failures During the Great Depression: The June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.