CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 759Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityHistorical Economic and Social StudiesEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies

Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973-1992: A Semiparametric Approach

Open access
DiNardo, John, Fortin, Nicole, Lemieux, Thomas·1995·National Bureau of Economic Research
DOI 10.3386/w5093
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

LABOUR MARKET ; WAGES

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w5093

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DFL procedure does not require any parametric model relating outcomes to characteristics.

    “the general approach following DFL has the advantage that is does not require any parametric model relating outcomes to characteristics.”

    From Changes in the Characteristics of American Youth: Implications for Adult Outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Dinardo, Fortin, and Lemieux (1995)

  • The DFL procedure is a generalization of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition procedure.

    “The DFL procedure can be interpreted as a generalization of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition procedure, since it is not based on an outcome equation that is linear in parameters.”

    From Changes in the Characteristics of American Youth: Implications for Adult Outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Dinardo, Fortin, and Lemieux (1995)

  • The DFL approach does not estimate parameters that relate outcomes to characteristics and that can potentially be interpreted.

    “The main disadvantage is that the DFL approach does not estimate parameters that relate outcomes to characteristics and that can potentially be interpreted.”

    From Changes in the Characteristics of American Youth: Implications for Adult Outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Dinardo, Fortin, and Lemieux (1995)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiNardo, J., Fortin, N., & Lemieux, T.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
ORCID
Fortin, Nicole
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Publisher
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
1995-04
DOI
10.3386/w5093
OpenAlex
W1515906603
Cited by
759
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 29
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Keywords
labour market institutions, wage distribution, wage inequality, semiparametric estimation, wage structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review