The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trade Liberalization and Income Distribution
Open accessAbstract
Empirical work relating trade liberalization and income distribution has identified an important anomaly.The Stolper-Samuelson theorem predicts that trade liberalization will shifi income toward a country's abundant factor.For developing countries, this suggests liberalization will principally benefit the abundant unskilled labor.Yet extensive empirical studies have identified many cases with a contrary result.This paper develops a simple theoretical explanation for this anomaly.It shows that countries which are labor abundant in a global sense may see wages decline with liberalization if they are capital abundant in a local sense.The current absence of empirical work that would allow us to identifi the relevant local abundance implies that virtually all assertions regarding anticipated distributional consequences of trade liberalization are without foundation.There may likewise be important implications for industrialized countries that border developing countries undertaking trade liberalization, particularly in regard to the incentives for migration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration
Sachs, J. D., Warner, A., Aslund, A., & Fischer, S. (1995) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.2307/2534573 · Cited by 4,950
Stolper, W. F., & Samuelson, P. A. (1941) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2967638 · Cited by 2,430
Cited by
Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy
Feenstra, R. C. (1998) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.12.4.31 · Cited by 2,069
Factor Immobility and Regional Impacts of Trade Liberalization: Evidence on Poverty from India
Topalova, P. (2010) · American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.2.4.1 · Cited by 658
Trade and Income Inequality in Developing Countries
Meschi, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2009) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.06.002 · Cited by 394
Financialization and the Labor Share of Income
Özdemir, O. (2019) · Review of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.2478/revecp-2019-0015 · Cited by 7
“…of international trade theory, the classical dichotomy of these arguments are critically assessed by including multiple skill-related categories of workers (Wood, 1994) in North-South distinction, countrygroups analysis (Davis, 1996), and categorization of traded goods (Feenstra and Hanson, 1996).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, D.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1996-08
- OpenAlex
- W2154515124
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trade Liberalization and Income Distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w5693
- The paper
- Davis, D. (1996). Trade Liberalization and Income Distribution. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.