The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stock Return Predictability: Is it There?
Open accessAbstract
6WR.N 5HWXUQ 3UHGL.WDELOLW\ ,V LW 7KHUH" $QGUHZ $QJ DQG *HHUW %HNDHUW 1%(5 :RUNLQJ 3DSHU 1R $SULO -(/ 1R & & &
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-y · Cited by 12,633
By Force of Habit: A Consumption‐Based Explanation of Aggregate Stock Market Behavior
Campbell, J. Y., & Cochrane, J. H. (1999) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250059 · Cited by 5,210
Cited by
A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction
Welch, I., & Goyal, A. (2008) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm014 · Cited by 3,987
Predicting excess stock returns out of sample: Can anything beat the historical average?
Campbell, J. Y., & Thompson, S. B. (2008) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm055 · Cited by 2,919
Credit spreads and business cycle fluctuations
Gilchrist, S., & Zakrajšek, E. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.4.1692 · Cited by 2,213
The Dog That Did Not Bark: A Defense of Return Predictability
Cochrane, J. H. (2008) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm046 · Cited by 1,227
Chong, E., Han, C., & Park, F. C. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.030 · Cited by 834
Metadata
- Authors
- Ang, A., & Bekaert, G.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2001-04
- OpenAlex
- W3123566210
- Cited by
- 897
- References
- 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
