The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plant- and Firm-Level Evidence on "New" Trade Theories
Open accessAbstract
YLGHQ.H RQ ³1HZ´ 7UDGH 7KHRULHV -DPHV 5 7\ERXW 1%(5 :RUNLQJ 3DSHU 1R $XJXVW -(/ 1R ) / / $%675$&7 %\ UHOD[LQJ WKH DVVXPSWLRQ RI SHUIH.W .RPSHWLWLRQ
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282804322970814 · Cited by 4,030
“James R. Tybout (2003) surveys the recent micro-level evidence on trade that has motivated these theoretical models.”
BackgroundThe Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity
Melitz, M. (2002) · doi:10.3386/w8881 · Cited by 2,996
Processing Trade, Tariff Reductions and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Firms
Yu, M. (2015) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12127 · Cited by 837
Trade Theory with Numbers: Quantifying the Consequences of Globalization
Costinot, A., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2014) · Handbook of International Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-54314-1.00004-5 · Cited by 624
The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Imprecise School Accountability Measures
Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2002) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533002320950993 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Tybout, J.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2001-08
- OpenAlex
- W3146122605
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant- and Firm-Level Evidence on "New" Trade Theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w8418
- The paper
- Tybout, J. (2001). Plant- and Firm-Level Evidence on "New" Trade Theories. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8418
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
