Cited by 0Nail Diseases and TreatmentsAmphibian and Reptile BiologyFungal Infections and Studies

Methods for examining immune and skin microbiome associations with dermatomycoses in reptiles: a review

Open access
Haydt, Natalie T., Neuman-Lee, Lorin A.·2026·Frontiers in Amphibian and Reptile Science

Abstract

The skin microbiome plays a significant role in immune defense during fungal skin infections, or dermatomycoses, which are increasingly impacting reptiles worldwide. Most dermatomycoses, or emerging fungal disease (EFDs) in reptiles have been linked to fungi in the order Onygenales and include Ophidiomyces ophidiicola infections (ophidiomycosis) in snakes, Nannizziopsis infections in lizards, and Emydomyces testovorans infections in turtles. Research examining either skin microbiome or immune function individually with respect to Onygenales-caused dermatomycoses in reptiles is becoming increasingly prevalent. However, there is a paucity of research investigating both immune and skin microbiome changes together. To set the stage for future integrative studies, we review current research on skin microbial associations, immunological responses, and dermatomycoses in reptiles, including research diagnosing and detecting dermatomycoses. We briefly present known dermatomycoses in reptiles, discuss techniques used to diagnose and detect dermatomycoses, and describe skin microbiome and immune function dynamics associated with identified dermatomycoses. We additionally provide suggestions for future research integrating immune and skin microbiome analysis with emerging diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/famrs.2026.1812456

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 169

Authors
Haydt, N. T., & Neuman-Lee, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Arkansas State University (US)
  • Molecular Biosciences Program, Arkansas State University, Department of Biological Sciences
Corresponding author
Haydt, Natalie T.
Venue
Frontiers in Amphibian and Reptile Science
Published
2026-05-19
Volume
4
ISSN
2813-6780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7161629616
Cited by
0
References
169
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Amphibian and Reptile Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2151820)
  • Arkansas State University
  • Grand Valley State University
  • University of Haifa
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nail Diseases and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
fungal skin infection, reptiles, skin microbiome, immune function, Onygenales, Ophidiomyces ophidiicola, ophidiomycosis, emerging fungal infections, snakes, lizards, turtles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review