Cited by 344Cancer Cells and MetastasisCellular Mechanics and InteractionsTGF-β signaling in diseases

The Role of the Extracellular Matrix in Cancer Stemness

Open access
Nallanthighal, Sameera, Heiserman, James Patrick, Cheon, Dong-Joo·2019·Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Abstract

As our understanding of cancer cell biology progresses, it has become clear that tumors are a heterogenous mixture of different cell populations, some of which contain so called "cancer stem cells" (CSCs). Hallmarks of CSCs include self-renewing capability, tumor-initiating capacity and chemoresistance. The extracellular matrix (ECM), a major structural component of the tumor microenvironment, is a highly dynamic structure and increasing evidence suggests that ECM proteins establish a physical and biochemical niche for CSCs. In cancer, abnormal ECM dynamics occur due to disrupted balance between ECM synthesis and secretion and altered expression of matrix-remodeling enzymes. Tumor-derived ECM is biochemically distinct in its composition and is stiffer compared to normal ECM. In this review, we will provide a brief overview of how different components of the ECM modulate CSC properties then discuss how physical, mechanical, and biochemical cues from the ECM drive cancer stemness. Given the fact that current CSC targeting therapies face many challenges, a better understanding of CSC-ECM interactions will be crucial to identify more effective therapeutic strategies to eliminate CSCs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fcell.2019.00086

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ECM imparts key biophysical properties to tumor tissue, including stiffness, porosity, insolubility, and molecular density, which serve as biomechanical cues modulating migration, proliferation, polarity maintenance, and lineage specification.

    “This biochemical framework imparts key biophysical properties to the tumor tissue, including stiffness, porosity, insolubility, and molecular density [5,77,78,79]. These characteristics serve as biomechanical cues that modulate diverse cellular processes, such as migration, proliferation, polarity maintenance, and lineage specification [25,80].”

    From Modeling Tumor Microenvironment Complexity In Vitro: Spheroids as Physiologically Relevant Tumor Models and Strategies for Their Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [78]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Abnormal tumor-associated angiogenesis leads to increased influx of fluids into the tumor; the lymphatic system cannot efficiently drain the increased influx, resulting in a net interstitial fluid pressure between the tumor mass and surrounding stroma that could increase to 30 mmHg at the tumor center.

    “In tumors, abnormal tumor‐associated angiogenesis leads to an increased influx of fluids into the tumor. However, the lymphatic system cannot efficiently drain out the increased influx of these fluids. This imbalanced flow results in a net interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) between the tumor mass and the surrounding stroma, which could increase to 30 mmHg at the tumor center.[ 39 ]”

    From 3D Biomimetic Models to Reconstitute Tumor Microenvironment In Vitro: Spheroids, Organoids, and Tumor‐on‐a‐Chip (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 163 · Cited by 344

Authors
Nallanthighal, S., Heiserman, J. P., & Cheon, D.-J.
Affiliations
Albany Medical College (US)
Corresponding author
Cheon, Dong-Joo
Venue
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Published
2019-07-05
Volume
7
Pages
86-86
ISSN
2296-634X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954998262
Cited by
344
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 3
FWCI
19.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
American Association for Cancer Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
Keywords
extracellular matrix, cancer stem cells, cancer stemness, tumor microenvironment, extracellular matrix stiffness, mechanotransduction, tumor heterogeneity, chemoresistance, self-renewal, tumor-initiating capacity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review