Cited by 76Computational Drug Discovery MethodsAnimal testing and alternativesDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection

Recent advances in AI-based toxicity prediction for drug discovery

Open access
Lee, Hyundo, Kim, Jisan, Kim, Ji-Woon, Lee, Yoonji·2025·Frontiers in Chemistry

Abstract

Toxicity, defined as the potential harm a substance can cause to living organisms, requires the implementation of stringent regulatory standards to ensure public safety. These standards involve comprehensive testing frameworks, including hazard identification, dose-response evaluation, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. In drug discovery and development, these processes are often complex, time-consuming, and also resource-intensive. Toxicity-related failures in the later stages of drug development can lead to substantial financial losses, underscoring the need for reliable toxicity prediction during the early discovery phases. The advent of computational approaches has accelerated a shift toward in silico modeling, virtual screening, and, notably, artificial intelligence (AI) to identify potential toxicities earlier in the pipeline. Ongoing advances in databases, algorithms, and computational power have further expanded AI’s role in pharmaceutical research. Today, AI models are capable of predicting wide range of toxicity endpoints, such as hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and genotoxicity, based on diverse molecular representations ranging from traditional descriptors to graph-based methods. This review provides an in-depth examination of AI-driven toxicity prediction, emphasizing its transformative impact on drug discovery and its growing importance in improving safety assessments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fchem.2025.1632046

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Toxicology predictions including genome-based hazard forecasts and machine-learning models are being researched to anticipate adverse characteristics and reduce dependence on extensive in vivo testing, though their application to probiotics is preliminary.

    “Toxicology predictions, including genome-based hazard forecasts and developing machine-learning models, are being researched to anticipate adverse characteristics and reduce dependence on extensive in vivo testing, despite their application to probiotics being at a preliminary stage [65,157].”

    From Current Concepts in Probiotic Safety and Efficacy (2026) · cites this paper as [157]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 76

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Babai S. Auclert L. Le-Louet H. (2021). Safety data and withdrawal of hepatotoxic drugs. Therapie 76 (6), 715– 723. 10.1016/j.therap.2018.02.004 29609830 · DOI
  2. Liu Y. Ding S. Zhou S. Fan W. Tan Q. (2024). Moleculargpt: open large language model (llm) for few-shot molecular property prediction. arXiv:2406. 12950
  3. Lundberg S. M. Lee S. I. (2017). “ A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” in NIPS'17: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach California USA, December 4 - 9, 2017, 4768– 4777.)
  4. NRC (1994). Science and judgment in risk assessment. National research Council (US) Committee on risk Assessment of hazardous air pollutants. Washington (DC): National Academies Press US. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208246/. 25032408
  5. Pei Q. Z. Zhang W. Zhu J. H. Wu K. H. Gao K. Y. Wu L. J. (2023). “ BioT5: enriching cross-modal integration in biology with chemical knowledge and natural language associations,” in 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Emnlp 2023, Singapore, December 6–10, 2023, 1102– 1123.
  6. Wu Z. X. Wang J. K. Du H. Y. Jiang D. J. Kang Y. Li D. (2023). Chemistry-intuitive explanation of graph neural networks for molecular property prediction with substructure masking. Nat. Commun. 14 (1), 2585. 10.1038/s41467-023-38192-3 37142585 PMC10160109 · DOI

Authors
Lee, H., Kim, J., Kim, J.-W., & Lee, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chung-Ang University (KR)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Kim, Ji-Woon
  • Lee, Yoonji
Venue
Frontiers in Chemistry
Published
2025-07-08
Volume
13
Pages
1632046-1632046
ISSN
2296-2646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412618471
Cited by
76
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 9
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Chung-Ang University
  • Ministry of Environment (2021003310005)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Keywords
drug discovery, drug safety assessment, virtual screening, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, genotoxicity, early drug development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review