Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vivo and In vitro Interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus spp.

Open access
Hotterbeekx, An, Kumar-Singh, Samir, Goossens, Herman, Malhotra-Kumar, Surbhi·2017·Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Abstract

The significance of polymicrobial infections is increasingly being recognized especially in a biofilm context wherein multiple bacterial species – including both potential pathogens and members of the commensal flora – communicate, cooperate and compete with each other. Two important bacterial pathogens that have developed a complex network of evasion, counter-inhibition and subjugation in their battle for space and nutrients are Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Their strain- and environment-specific interactions, for instance in the cystic fibrosis lung or in wound infections, show severe competition that is generally linked to worse patient outcomes. For instance, the extracellular factors secreted by P. aeruginosa have been shown to subjugate S. aureus to persist as small colony variants. On the other hand, data also exist where S. aureus inhibits biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa but also protects the pathogen by inhibiting its phagocytosis. Interestingly, such interspecies interactions differ between the planktonic and biofilm phenotype, with the extracellular matrix components of the latter likely being a key, and largely underexplored, influence.This review attempts to understand the complex relationship between P. aeruginosa and Staphylococcus spp., focusing on S. aureus, that not only is interesting from the bacterial evolution point of view, but also has important consequences for our understanding of the disease pathogenesis for better patient management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00106

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Hotterbeekx, A., Kumar-Singh, S., Goossens, H., & Malhotra-Kumar, S.
Venue
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Published
2017-04-03
Volume
7
Pages
106-106
ISSN
2235-2988 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2599504373
Cited by
265
References
76
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo and In vitro Interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus spp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00106
The paper
Hotterbeekx, A., Kumar-Singh, S., Goossens, H., & Malhotra-Kumar, S. (2017). In vivo and In vitro Interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus spp. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.