Cited by 14Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics research

Aneuploidy Underlies Brefeldin A‐Induced Antifungal Drug Resistance in Cryptococcus Neoformans

Open access
Zhang, Zhi-hui, Sun, Liu-liu, Fu, Bu-qing, Deng, Jie, Jia, Cheng-lin, Miao, Ming-xing, Yang, Feng, Cao, Yong-bing +1 more·2024·Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Abstract

Cryptococcus neoformans is at the top of the list of “most wanted” human pathogens. Only three classes of antifungal drugs are available for the treatment of cryptococcosis. Studies on antifungal resistance mechanisms are limited to the investigation of how a particular antifungal drug induces resistance to a particular drug, and the impact of stresses other than antifungals on the development of antifungal resistance and even cross-resistance is largely unexplored. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a ubiquitous subcellular organelle of eukaryotic cells. Brefeldin A (BFA) is a widely used chemical inducer of ER stress. Here, we found that both weak and strong selection by BFA caused aneuploidy formation in C. neoformans, mainly disomy of chromosome 1, chromosome 3, and chromosome 7. Disomy of chromosome 1 conferred cross-resistance to two classes of antifungal drugs: fluconazole and 5-flucytosine, as well as hypersensitivity to amphotericin B. However, drug resistance was unstable, due to the intrinsic instability of aneuploidy. We found overexpression of AFR1 on Chr1 and GEA2 on Chr3 phenocopied BFA resistance conferred by chromosome disomy. Overexpression of AFR1 also caused resistance to fluconazole and hypersensitivity to amphotericin B. Furthermore, a strain with a deletion of AFR1 failed to form chromosome 1 disomy upon BFA treatment. Transcriptome analysis indicated that chromosome 1 disomy simultaneously upregulated AFR1, ERG11, and other efflux and ERG genes. Thus, we posit that BFA has the potential to drive the rapid development of drug resistance and even cross-resistance in C. neoformans, with genome plasticity as the accomplice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1397724

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caspofungin heteroresistance in C. glabrata is in sharp contrast to the mechanism described for C. albicans and C. neoformans heteroresistance, where aneuploidy is a common driver.

    “This finding positions caspofungin heteroresistance in C. glabrata in sharp contrast to the mechanism described for C. albicans and C. neoformans heteroresistance, where aneuploidy is a common driver [36, 37].”
  • In C. neoformans, chr1 disomy may confer cross-resistance to both azoles and 5-FC.

    “and, in C. neoformans, chr1 disomy may confer cross-resistance to both azoles and 5-FC [139].”
  • The endoplasmic reticulum stress chemo inducer Brefeldin A led to aneuploidy in C. neoformans, with disomy in chromosome 1 leading to cross-resistance to fluconazole and 5-FC plus hypersensitivity to AmB.

    “Zhang et al. found that the endoplasmic reticulum stress chemo inducer Brefeldin A led to aneuploidy in C. neoformans: disomy in chromosome 1 led to cross-resistance to two classes of antifungal drugs, fluconazole and 5-FC, plus hypersensitivity to AmB [139].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 14

Authors
Zhang, Z.-H., Sun, L.-L., Fu, B.-Q., Deng, J., Jia, C.-L., Miao, M.-X., Yang, F., Cao, Y.-B., & Yan, T.-H.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN)
  • Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Corresponding author
Cao, Yong-bing
Venue
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Published
2024-06-20
Volume
14
Pages
1397724-1397724
ISSN
2235-2988 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399868637
Cited by
14
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81673478)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Cryptococcus neoformans, brefeldin A, aneuploidy, antifungal resistance, cross-resistance, endoplasmic reticulum stress, fluconazole resistance, 5-fluorocytosine, genome plasticity, ERG11, efflux genes, cryptococcosis
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Aneuploidy, Antifungal Agents, Cryptococcus neoformans, Flucytosine, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Fluconazole, Brefeldin A, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review