Cited by 21

Schooling beyond Covid-19: an unevenly distributed future

Brown, Gavin T. L.·2020·Frontiers in Education

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/feduc.2020.00082

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Adamson, F., Åstrand, B., and Darling-Hammond, L. (Eds.). (2016). Global Education Reform: How Privatization and Public Investment Influence Education Outcomes. New York, NY: Routledge.
  2. Brown, G. T. L., and Hattie, J. A. (2012). "The benefits of regular standardized assessment in childhood education: guiding improved instruction and learning, " in Contemporary Debates in Childhood Education and Development, eds S. Suggate and E. Reese (London: Routledge), 287-292.
  3. Brown, G. T. L., O'Leary, T. M., and Hattie, J. A. C. (2018). "Effective reporting for formative assessment: the asTTle case example, " in Score Reporting: Research and Applications, ed D. Zapata-Rivera (New York, NY: Routledge), 107-125.
  4. Cole, M. (2010). What's culture got to do with it? Educational research as a necessarily interdisciplinary enterprise. Educ. Res. 39, 461-470. doi: 10.3102/0013189X10380247 · DOI
  5. Cuban, L. (2003). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  6. Hershberg, T. (2002). "Comment, " in Brookings Papers on Education Policy, ed D. Ravitch (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press), 324-333.
  7. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
  8. Lingard, B., and Lewis, S. (2016). "Globalization of the Anglo-American approach to top-down, test-based educational accountability, " in Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, eds G. T. L. Brown and L. R. Harris (New York, NY: Routledge), 387-403.
  9. Luecht, R., Brumfield, T., and Breithaupt, K. (2006). A testlet assembly design for adaptive multistage tests. Appl. Meas. Educ. 19, 189-202. doi: 10.1207/s15324818ame1903_2 · DOI
  10. Nichols, S. L., and Harris, L. R. (2016). "Accountability assessment's effects on teachers and schools, " in Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, eds G. T. L. Brown and L. R. Harris (New York, NY: Routledge), 40-56.
  11. OECD (2001). What Schools for the Future? Retrieved from: https://www. oecd-ilibrary.org/education/what-schools-for-the-future_9789264195004-en (accessed May 25, 2020).
  12. Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. New York, NY: Penguin Random House.
  13. Powell, D. (2014). "The corporatization of health education curricula: 'Part of the solution' to childhood obesity?" in Health Education: Critical Perspectives, eds K. Fitzpatrick and R. Tinning (Oxon: Routledge), 142-156.
  14. Rogoff, B. (1991). "The joint socialization of development by young children and adults, " in Learning to Think: Child Development in Social Context 2, eds P. Light, S. Sheldon, and M. Woodhead (London: Routledge), 67-96.
  15. Sahlberg, P. (2014). Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn From Educational Change in Finland? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  16. von Davier, A. A., Deonovic, B., Yudelson, M., Polyak, S. T., and Woo, A. (2019). Computational psychometrics approach to holistic learning and assessment systems. Front. Educ. 4:69. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00069 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, G. T. L.
Venue
Frontiers in Education
Published
2020-05-29
Volume
5
ISSN
2504-284X
Cited by
21
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review