Psychosocial Skills as a Protective Factor and Other Teacher Recommendations for Online Harms Prevention in Schools: A Qualitative Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Rising prevalence of mental disorders among children and adolescents in the United Kingdom has arguably been associated with increased levels of problematic smartphone use and social media use, rendering the need for health promotion at a school level. However, evidence on how teachers may best support media literacy and emotional wellbeing is lacking. The present study explored perceptions of adolescent online engagement and recommendations of how schools could prevent the experience of online harms during adolescence through qualitative interviews with teachers (N= 9,Mage= 39.2 years,SD= 7.74). Results were analysed using thematic analysis and provided the following themes in terms of recommendations for online harms: i)schools in transition and redefining expectations, ii)a modular approach to media and emotional literacy, iii)media and emotional literacy teacher training,and iv)encourage dialogue and foster psychosocial skills. Psychosocial skills were further analysed as critical components of perceived online harm prevention into the following categories: i)self-control and emotion regulation skills, ii)digital resilience and assertiveness skills, iii)social and emotional intelligence and metacognitive skills to encourage balanced use and emotional health. Findings corroborated the need for an increasing health promotion role of teachers and school counsellors and in the contribution of students’ cognitive and emotional development through skill acquisition. Implications are discussed for the role of educational settings in prevention of online harms, while preserving the significant benefits of digital media for education and social connection, and for the prompt identification and referral of problematic users to adolescent mental health services.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adolescents with higher assertiveness tend to demonstrate more decisive, vigilant, and courageous responses in rejecting suspicious invitations or interactions from strangers online.
“Adolescents with higher assertiveness tend to demonstrate more decisive, vigilant, and courageous responses in rejecting suspicious invitations or interactions from strangers online (Throuvala et al., 2021).”
From Surfing Online Safety: Assertiveness and Parental Involvement in Adolescents’ Attitudes Toward Cyber Grooming (2025) · cites this paper as Throuvala et al., 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 123 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Throuvala, M. A., Griffiths, M. D., Rennoldson, M., & Kuss, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Nottingham Trent University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Throuvala, Melina A.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Education
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-05-21
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2504-284X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3164757641
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 123
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Keywords
- psychosocial skills, adolescents, media literacy, emotional literacy, teacher professional development, self-control, emotion regulation, digital resilience, social-emotional intelligence, smartphone addiction, social media use, school health promotion, school counselors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review