Cited by 19Impact of Technology on AdolescentsLiteracy, Media, and EducationChild Development and Digital Technology

Psychosocial Skills as a Protective Factor and Other Teacher Recommendations for Online Harms Prevention in Schools: A Qualitative Analysis

Open access
Throuvala, Melina A., Griffiths, Mark D., Rennoldson, Mike, Kuss, Daria J.·2021·Frontiers in Education

Abstract

Rising prevalence of mental disorders among children and adolescents in the United Kingdom has arguably been associated with increased levels of problematic smartphone use and social media use, rendering the need for health promotion at a school level. However, evidence on how teachers may best support media literacy and emotional wellbeing is lacking. The present study explored perceptions of adolescent online engagement and recommendations of how schools could prevent the experience of online harms during adolescence through qualitative interviews with teachers (N= 9,Mage= 39.2 years,SD= 7.74). Results were analysed using thematic analysis and provided the following themes in terms of recommendations for online harms: i)schools in transition and redefining expectations, ii)a modular approach to media and emotional literacy, iii)media and emotional literacy teacher training,and iv)encourage dialogue and foster psychosocial skills. Psychosocial skills were further analysed as critical components of perceived online harm prevention into the following categories: i)self-control and emotion regulation skills, ii)digital resilience and assertiveness skills, iii)social and emotional intelligence and metacognitive skills to encourage balanced use and emotional health. Findings corroborated the need for an increasing health promotion role of teachers and school counsellors and in the contribution of students’ cognitive and emotional development through skill acquisition. Implications are discussed for the role of educational settings in prevention of online harms, while preserving the significant benefits of digital media for education and social connection, and for the prompt identification and referral of problematic users to adolescent mental health services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/feduc.2021.648512

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents with higher assertiveness tend to demonstrate more decisive, vigilant, and courageous responses in rejecting suspicious invitations or interactions from strangers online.

    “Adolescents with higher assertiveness tend to demonstrate more decisive, vigilant, and courageous responses in rejecting suspicious invitations or interactions from strangers online (Throuvala et al., 2021).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 123 · Cited by 19

Authors
Throuvala, M. A., Griffiths, M. D., Rennoldson, M., & Kuss, D. J.
Affiliations
Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Corresponding author
Throuvala, Melina A.
Venue
Frontiers in Education
Published
2021-05-21
Volume
6
ISSN
2504-284X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3164757641
Cited by
19
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
psychosocial skills, adolescents, media literacy, emotional literacy, teacher professional development, self-control, emotion regulation, digital resilience, social-emotional intelligence, smartphone addiction, social media use, school health promotion, school counselors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review