Predicting STEM students’ adoption of generative AI in academic contexts: an application of the UTAUT model
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has created new opportunities and challenges in higher education, particularly in STEM disciplines. Understanding the factors that influence students' behavioral intention to adopt generative AI is essential for effective integration into learning environments. This study applies the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to examine these factors among STEM students. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 464 STEM students at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University in Saudi Arabia. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the proposed model. Model fit indices indicated good fit (χ 2 /df = 2.94, GFI = 0.92, AGFI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.056, NFI = 0.91, CFI = 0.94). Results: Performance expectancy (β = 0.491, p < 0.001), effort expectancy (β = 0.130, p < 0.001), social influence (β = 0.239, p < 0.001), and facilitating conditions (β = 0.213, p < 0.001) significantly predicted behavioral intention to adopt generative AI. Subgroup analyses revealed higher adoption intentions among female students, those with beginner-level computer experience, and students majoring in Engineering and Computer Science. Discussion: The findings highlight the crucial role of perceived usefulness, ease of use, social norms, and institutional support in influencing AI adoption among STEM students. To enhance adoption, the study recommends improving digital infrastructure, providing targeted AI training, and promoting peer-led initiatives. Future research should investigate longitudinal and cross-cultural dynamics of AI adoption in education.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on technology adoption indicates that effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions shape students' intentions to use GenAI.
“Research on technology adoption likewise indicates that effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions shape students’ intentions to use GenAI (BinJwair, 2025).”
From Responsible use of generative AI in Chinese vocational education: eye-tracking evidence on source verification and immediate near-transfer across three information-seeking conditions (2026) · cites this paper as BinJwair, 2025
The study therefore evaluates execution under assigned conditions rather than the mechanisms governing spontaneous adoption in natural use.
“The study therefore evaluates execution under assigned conditions rather than the mechanisms governing spontaneous adoption in natural use (BinJwair, 2025).”
From Responsible use of generative AI in Chinese vocational education: eye-tracking evidence on source verification and immediate near-transfer across three information-seeking conditions (2026) · cites this paper as BinJwair, 2025
Cites
Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011) · Advances in International Marketing · doi:10.1108/s1474-7979(2011)0000022012 · Cited by 1,326 · see citing works
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ma, J., Yue, H., & Li, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1946196
- Authors
- BinJwair, A.
- Affiliations
- Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- BinJwair, Amani
- ORCID
- BinJwair, Amani
- Venue
- Frontiers in Education
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-11-24
- Volume
- 10
- ISSN
- 2504-284X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4416607865
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- generative AI, technology adoption, STEM students, UTAUT, behavioral intention, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, gender differences, computer experience, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review