Cited by 93Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorEating Disorders and Behaviors

Hunger and Satiety Gauge Reward Sensitivity

Open access
Cassidy, Ryan Michael, Tong, Qingchun·2017·Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

Many of the neurocircuits and hormones known to underlie the sensations of hunger and satiety also substantially alter the activity of the dopaminergic reward system. Much interest lies in the ways that hunger, satiety, and reward tie together, as the epidemic of obesity seems tied to the recent development and mass availability of highly palatable foods. In this review, we will first discuss the basic neurocircuitry of the midbrain and basal forebrain reward system. We will elaborate how several important mediators of hunger-the agouti-related protein neurons of the arcuate nucleus, the lateral hypothalamic nucleus, and ghrelin-enhance the sensitivity of the dopaminergic reward system. Then, we will elaborate how mediators of satiety-the nucleus tractus solitarius, pro-opiomelanocortin neurons of the arcuate nucleus, and its peripheral hormonal influences such as leptin-reduce the reward system sensitivity. We hope to provide a template by which future research may identify the ways in which highly rewarding foods bypass this balanced system to produce excessive food consumption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fendo.2017.00104

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 148 · Cited by 93

Authors
Cassidy, R. M., & Tong, Q.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Cassidy, Ryan Michael
Venue
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2017-05-18
Volume
8
Pages
104-104
ISSN
1664-2392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2614979820
Cited by
93
References
148
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01DK092605, R01DK109934)
  • University of Texas System (UT BRAIN Initiative and CTSA UL1 TR000371)
  • Welch Foundation (L-AU0002)
  • American Heart Association (15GRNT22370024)
  • American Diabetes Association (1-15-BS-184)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
hunger, satiety, reward sensitivity, dopaminergic reward system, obesity, highly palatable food, arcuate nucleus, lateral hypothalamic nucleus, ghrelin, nucleus tractus solitarius, proopiomelanocortin neurons, leptin, food intake regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review