Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vitamin D Supplementation Guidelines for General Population and Groups at Risk of Vitamin D Deficiency in Poland—Recommendations of the Polish Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes and the Expert Panel With Participation of National Specialist Consultants and Representatives of Scientific Societies—2018 Update

Open access
Rusińska, Agnieszka, Płudowski, Paweł, Walczak, Mieczysław, Borszewska-Kornacka, Maria K., Bossowski, Artur, Chlebna-Sokół, Danuta, Czech-Kowalska, Justyna, Dobrzańska, Anna, Franek, Edward, Helwich, Ewa, Jackowska, Teresa, Kalina, Maria A., Konstantynowicz, Jerzy, Książyk, Janusz, Lewiński, Andrzej, Łukaszkiewicz, Jacek, Marcinowska-Suchowierska, Ewa, Mazur, Artur, Michałus, Izabela, Peregud-Pogorzelski, Jarosław, Romanowska, Hanna, Ruchała, Marek, Socha, Piotr, Szalecki, Mieczysław, Wielgoś, Mirosław, Zwolińska, Danuta, Zygmunt, Arkadiusz·2018·Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vitamin D deficiency is an important public health problem worldwide. Vitamin D deficiency confers a significant risk for both skeletal and non-skeletal disorders and a number of lifelong negative health outcomes. The objectives of this evidence-based guidelines document are to provide health care professionals in Poland, an updated recommendation for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of vitamin D deficiency. METHODS: A systematic literature search examining the prevention and treatment strategies for vitamin D deficiency was conducted. Updated recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system describing the strength of the recommendation and the quality of supporting evidence. Twenty-seven contributors representing different areas of expertise and medical specialties, including pediatricians, geriatricians, endocrinologists, epidemiologists, nephrologists, gynecologists and obstetricians evaluated the available published evidence related to vitamin D, formulated the goals of this document and developed a common consolidated position. The consensus group, representing six national specialist consultants and eight Polish and international scientific organizations/societies, participated in the process of grading evidence and drawing up the general and specific recommendations. RESULTS: The updated recommendations define the diagnostic criteria for the evaluation of vitamin D status and describe the prevention and treatment strategies of vitamin D deficiency in the general population and in groups at increased risk of the deficiency. Age- and weight-specific recommendations for prevention, supplementation and treatment of vitamin D deficiency are presented, and detailed practice guidance is discussed regarding the management in primary and specialized health care. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D deficiency remains still highly prevalent in Poland, in all age groups. Currently, there is a great necessity to implement a regular supplementation with recommended doses and to develop an effective strategy to alleviate vitamin D deficiency in the population. These updated recommendations are addressed to health professionals and the authorities pursuing comprehensive health policies and should also be included in public health programs aimed at preventing a broad spectrum of chronic diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fendo.2018.00246

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Rusińska, A., Płudowski, P., Walczak, M., Borszewska-Kornacka, M. K., Bossowski, A., Chlebna-Sokół, D., Czech-Kowalska, J., Dobrzańska, A., Franek, E., Helwich, E., Jackowska, T., Kalina, M. A., Konstantynowicz, J., Książyk, J., Lewiński, A., Łukaszkiewicz, J., Marcinowska-Suchowierska, E., Mazur, A., Michałus, I., Peregud-Pogorzelski, J., Romanowska, H., Ruchała, M., Socha, P., Szalecki, M., Wielgoś, M., Zwolińska, D., & Zygmunt, A.
Venue
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2018-05-31
Volume
9
Pages
246-246
ISSN
1664-2392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800024516
Cited by
264
References
4
FWCI
18.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vitamin D Supplementation Guidelines for General Population and Groups at Risk of Vitamin D Deficiency in Poland—Recommendations of the Polish Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes and the Expert Panel With Participation of National Specialist Consultants and Representatives of Scientific Societies—2018 Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fendo.2018.00246
The paper
Rusińska, A., Płudowski, P., Walczak, M., Borszewska-Kornacka, M. K., Bossowski, A., Chlebna-Sokół, D., Czech-Kowalska, J., Dobrzańska, A., Franek, E., Helwich, E., Jackowska, T., Kalina, M. A., Konstantynowicz, J., Książyk, J., Lewiński, A., Łukaszkiewicz, J., Marcinowska-Suchowierska, E., Mazur, A., Michałus, I., . . . Zygmunt, A. (2018). Vitamin D Supplementation Guidelines for General Population and Groups at Risk of Vitamin D Deficiency in Poland—Recommendations of the Polish Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes and the Expert Panel With Participation of National Specialist Consultants and Representatives of Scientific Societies—2018 Update. Frontiers in Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00246

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.