Cited by 41Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Impact of serum estradiol levels prior to progesterone administration in artificially prepared frozen embryo transfer cycles

Open access
Mackens, Shari, Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel, Orinx, Ellen, De Munck, Neelke, Racca, Annalisa, Roelens, Caroline, Popovic-Todorovic, Biljana, De Vos, Michel +2 more·2020·Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

Background The need for endocrine monitoring in artificial cycles for frozen embryo transfer (FET) remains unclear and, more specifically, the value of the late-proliferative phase serum estradiol (E2) levels is with conflicting evidence in current literature. Objective To investigate whether artificial FET cycles require endocrine monitoring for the serum E2 level prior to initiation of exogenous progesterone administration after an endometrial thickness of 6.5 mm has been reached. Design One thousand two hundred and twenty-two (n=1222) artificial FETs performed in a tertiary centre between 2010-2015 were subdivided into 3 groups according to the following late-proliferative serum E2 level percentiles: ≤p10 (E2 ≤144 pg/ml; n=124), p11 – p90 (E2 from 145 to 438 pg/ml; n=977) and >p90 (E2 >439 pg/ml; n=121). A mixed-effects multilevel multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the potential effect of the late-proliferative E2 level on the live birth rate (LBR). Results The level of late-proliferative circulating E2 showed no significant difference in terms of LBR after FET. Specifically, the multivariable regression model demonstrated a LBR of 19.5% for the p11-p90 reference group, compared to 24.4% for the ≤p10 (p=0.251) and 19.5% for the >p90 group (p=0.989). Conclusion In this large retrospective dataset, no association was observed between late-proliferative phase serum E2 levels and LBR following FET in artificially prepared cycles. Although, caution is warranted due to the retrospective nature of the analysis and the potential for unmeasured confounding, we argue that monitoring of the late-proliferative serum E2 levels and using them to guide clinical decision-making (e.g. medication step-up, cycle prolongation or cancelation) may be of questionable value.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fendo.2020.00255

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within reasonable limits, the dose of estradiol priming does not change embryo implantation rates.

    “the necessity for sufficient estrogen priming is very permissive, with no difference in embryo implantation rates related to the duration (2, 3) and/or dosing of E 2 priming (4), within reasonable limits of course”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 41

Authors
Mackens, S., Santos-Ribeiro, S., Orinx, E., De Munck, N., Racca, A., Roelens, C., Popovic-Todorovic, B., De Vos, M., Tournaye, H., & Blockeel, C.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Blockeel, Christophe
Venue
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2020-04-30
Volume
11
Pages
255-255
ISSN
1664-2392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023377272
Cited by
41
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
frozen embryo transfer, serum estradiol, endocrine monitoring, exogenous progesterone, live birth rate, endometrial thickness, ovulation induction
MeSH terms
Adult, Embryo Transfer, Estradiol, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Progestins, Progesterone, Retrospective Studies, Cryopreservation, Pregnancy Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review