CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Revising the effectiveness of municipal waste management in Hong Kong

Ma, Fong Ching, Wong, Tsan Lok, Chan, Chun Ngai, Ran, Lishan·2023·Frontiers in Environmental Science
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1178363
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although there have been many studies related to the municipal solid waste (MSW) problem in Hong Kong, only limited research has recently discussed the spatial variation of citizens’ environmental awareness in different geographical constituencies. Also, the relationship between environmental awareness of citizens and the effectiveness of waste management has been poorly understood. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of three proposed approaches; investigate whether the environmental awareness of citizens will affect the effectiveness of current waste management strategies; and examine the differences in the level of environmental awareness of residents in different geographical constituencies, so we can provide suggestions to help mitigate the solid waste problem. In addition, the hypothesis is that there is a relationship between environmental awareness of citizens and its effectiveness. This research adopted quantitative observations and questionnaires as well as qualitative interviews to understand the public perception about the proposed MSW charging, plastic shopping bag charging and recycling in Hong Kong. This research confirmed that the environmental awareness of Hong Kong citizens varies among various geographical constituencies. Residents in Kowloon West have comparatively lower environmental awareness may due largely to the socio-economic background of residents and comparatively unhygienic environment, and they often do not support plastic shopping bag charging and recycling. In addition, males have a lower environmental awareness than females as their attitude towards charging policy may not have much impact on their lifestyle. It is not surprising that low environmental awareness of citizens will reduce the effectiveness of current environmental policies. MSW charging tends to be effective and should be implemented in Hong Kong. Furthermore, plastic shopping bag charging can be effective in the short term but ineffective in the long term, and recycling tends to be invalid as Hong Kong has not developed a circular economy. The limitations of each policy should be considered, and more studies are needed to improve the existing policies as well as exploring novel ways to solve the MSW problem.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1178363

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Alzamora, 2020, Review of municipal waste management charging methods in different countries, Waste Manag., 115, 47, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.020 · DOI
  2. Autio, 2005, Young people in knowledge society: Possibilities to fulfil ecological goals, Prog. Industrial Ecol., 2, 403, 10.1504/pie.2005.007817 · DOI
  3. Bartl, 2014, Ways and entanglements of the waste hierarchy, Waste Manag., 34, 1, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.016 · DOI
  4. Calabro, 2009, Greenhouse gases emission from municipal waste management: The role of separate collection, Waste Manag., 29, 2178, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.02.011 · DOI
  5. Chamizo-González, 2018, Does funding of waste services follow the polluter pays principle? The case of Spain, J. Clean. Prod., 183, 1054, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.225 · DOI
  6. Chandra, 2020, Non-monetary intervention to discourage consumption of single-use plastic bags, Behav. Public Policy, 7, 143, 10.1017/bpp.2020.9 · DOI
  7. Cole, 2019, An assessment of achievements of the WEEE directive in promoting movement up the waste hierarchy: Experiences in the UK, Waste Manag., 87, 417, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.046 · DOI
  8. Convery, 2007, The most popular tax in europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy, Environ. Resour. Econ., 38, 1, 10.1080/00420987620080571 · DOI
  9. Drakakis-Smith, 1976, Urban renewal in an asian context: A case study in Hong Kong, Urban Stud., 13, 295, 10.1080/00420987620080571 · DOI
  10. Ewijk, 2016, Limitations of the waste hierarchy for achieving absolute reductions in material throughput, J. Clean. Prod., 132, 122, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.051 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gharfalkar, 2015, Analysis of waste hierarchy in the European waste directive 2008/98/EC, Waste Manag., 39, 305, 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gottberg, 2006, Producer responsibility, waste minimisation and the WEEE Directive: Case studies in eco-design from the European lighting sector, Sci. Total Environ., 359, 38, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.07.001 · DOI
  13. Gregson, 2013, Moving up the waste hierarchy: Car boot sales, reuse exchange and the challenges of consumer culture to waste prevention, Resour. Conservation Recycl., 77, 97, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.06.005 · DOI
  14. He, 2012, Effects of environmental policy on consumption: Lessons from the Chinese plastic bag regulation, Environ. Dev. Econ., 17, 407, 10.1017/s1355770x1200006x · DOI
  15. Hoornweg, 2012, What a waste: A global review of solid waste management
  16. Knotek, 2008, Convenient prices, currency, and nominal rigidity: Theory with evidence from newspaper prices, J. Monetary Econ., 55, 1303, 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2008.07.009 · DOI
  17. Kwong, 2014, Investigation of policies, environmental impacts, consumption and fate of plastic bags, Plymouth Student Sci., 7, 100
  18. Lawrence, 2020, Sustaining voluntary recycling programmes in a country transitioning to an integrated solid waste management system, J. Environ. Manag., 257, 109966, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109966 · DOI
  19. Lee, 2010, E-Waste recycling systems and sound circulative economies in East asia: A comparative analysis of systems in Japan, South Korea, China and taiwan, Sustainability, 2, 1632, 10.1007/s10531-008-9507-0 · DOI
  20. Levrel, 2009, OECD pressure–state–response indicators for managing biodiversity: A realistic perspective for a French biosphere reserve, Biodivers. Conservation, 18, 1719, 10.1007/s10531-008-9507-0 · DOI
  21. Muralidharan, 2016, Tax” and “fee” message frames as inhibitors of plastic bag usage among shoppers: A social marketing application of the theory of planned behavior, Soc. Mark. Q., 22, 200, 10.1177/1524500416631522 · DOI
  22. Nas, 2004, Informal waste management, Informal waste Manag. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 6, 337, 10.1023/b:envi.0000029912.41481.a5 · DOI
  23. Naughton, 2020, Will the COVID-19 pandemic change waste generation and composition? The need for more real-time waste management data and systems thinking, Resour. Conservation, Recycl., 162, 105050, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105050 · DOI
  24. Neufeld, 2016, The new plastics economy: Rethinking the future of plastics
  25. Nielsen, 2019, Need a bag? A review of public policies on plastic carrier bags – where, how and to what effect?, Waste Manag., 87, 428, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.025 · DOI
  26. Pires, 2019, Waste hierarchy index for circular economy in waste management, Waste Manag., 95, 298, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.014 · DOI
  27. Poortinga, 2016, The English plastic bag charge: Changes in attitudes and behaviour
  28. Sembiring, 2010, Sustainable solid waste management toward an inclusive society: Integration of the informal sector, Resour. Conservation Recycl., 54, 802, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.12.010 · DOI
  29. Stahel, 2016, The circular economy, Nat. News, 531, 435, 10.1038/531435a · DOI · Paper page
  30. Szeberényi, 2017, Environmentally conscious lifestyle analysis among high school and University students in a Hungarian rural town of the Heves County, Visegrad J. Bioeconomy Sustain. Dev., 6, 74, 10.1515/vjbsd-2017-0013 · DOI
  31. Teigiserova, 2020, Towards transparent valorization of food surplus, waste and loss: Clarifying definitions, food waste hierarchy, and role in the circular economy, Sci. Total Environ., 706, 136033, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136033 · DOI · Paper page
  32. The Government of the Hong Kong special administrative region [The Government of the HKSAR], Dine-in service rule exemption set
  33. The Government of the Hong Kong special administrative region [The Government of the HKSAR], Government amends the prevention and control of disease (wearingof mask) regulation and extends social distancing measures
  34. Tomari, 2017, Development of reverse vending machine (RVM) framework for implementation to a standard recycle bin, Procedia Comput. Sci., 105, 75, 10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.202 · DOI
  35. Troschinetz, 2009, Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries, Waste Manag., 29, 915, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.016 · DOI
  36. Tsien, 2014, Ageing in place in Hong Kong
  37. Varnäs, 2009, Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts: Current practice, problems and opportunities in green procurement in the Swedish construction industry, J. Clean. Prod., 17, 1214, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.001 · DOI
  38. Wan, 2018, Differential public support for waste management policy: The case of Hong Kong, J. Clean. Prod., 175, 477, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.060 · DOI
  39. Wan, 2014, The role of perceived effectiveness of policy measures in predicting recycling behaviour in Hong Kong, Resour. Conservation Recycl., 83, 141, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.009 · DOI
  40. Williams, 2004, Maximising household waste recycling at civic amenity sites in Lancashire, England, Waste Manag., 24, 861, 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.02.002 · DOI
  41. Wilson, 2006, Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries, Habitat Int., 30, 797, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.09.005 · DOI
  42. Wut, 2021, Does gender matter? Attitude towards waste charging policy and pro-environmental behaviours, Soc. Responsib. J., 17, 1100, 10.1108/srj-03-2020-0102 · DOI
  43. Yang, 2007, Economic incentives and residential waste management in taiwan: An empirical investigation, Environ. Resour. Econ., 37, 489, 10.1007/s10640-006-9040-0 · DOI
  44. Yeung, 2018, Factors that affect the willingness of residents to pay for solid waste management in Hong Kong, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 7504, 10.1007/s11356-017-1009-8 · DOI
  45. Yim, 2014, An assessment indicator for air ventilation and pollutant dispersion potential in an urban canopy with complex natural terrain and significant wind variations, Atmos. Environ., 94, 297, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.044 · DOI
  46. Zhu, 2006, Inspiration to Shanghai from waste charging in Singapore, Environ. Sanit. Eng., 14, 19

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Ma, F. C., Wong, T. L., Chan, C. N., & Ran, L.
Venue
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2023-04-10
Volume
11
ISSN
2296-665X
DOI
10.3389/fenvs.2023.1178363
Cited by
8
References
0
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review