Assessing DNA sequence alignment methods for characterizing ancient genomes and methylomes
Open accessAbstract
Applying high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies to the ancient DNA molecules preserved in subfossil material can provide genetic information from past individuals, populations and communities at the genomic scale. The combination of dedicated statistical techniques and specific molecular tools aimed at reducing the impact of post-mortem DNA damage can also help recover epigenetic data from ancient individuals. However, the capacity of different sequence aligners to identify ultrashort and deaminated ancient DNA templates, and their impact on the characterization of ancient methylomes, remain overlooked. In this study, we use both simulated and real ancient DNA sequence data to benchmark the performance of the read alignment tools most commonly used in ancient DNA research. We identify a read alignment strategy making use of the Bowtie2 aligner that substantially reduce computational times but shows increased sensitivity relative to previous recommendations based on the BWA aligner. This strategy significantly improves the genome coverage especially when DNA templates are shorter than 90bp, as is typically the case for ancient DNA. It also impacts on ancient DNA methylation estimates as it maximizes coverage improvement within CpG dinucleotide contexts, which hold the vast majority of DNA methylation marks in mammals. Our work contributes to improve the accuracy of DNA methylation maps and to maximize the amount of recoverable genetic information from archaeological and subfossil material. As the molecular complexity of ancient DNA libraries is generally limited, the mapping strategy recommended here is essential to both limit sequencing costs and sample destruction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Poullet et al. find that end-to-end mode is optimal for Bowtie2 in an aDNA context.
“and Poullet et al. find that –end-to-end mode is optimal for Bowtie2 [12] in an aDNA context [13].”
From <tt>SAFARI</tt> : pangenome alignment of ancient DNA using purine/pyrimidine encodings (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
In Overall Alignment Performance (page unavailable), the paper reports maximal sensitivity for Bowtie2 end-to-end mode, but also reports that it consistently reduced coverage by 2.93–11.15% in ancient DNA data without USER treatment. The Alignment Performance at CpG Sites section (page unavailable) reports maximal CpG coverage gain for the sensitive end-to-end option in USER-treated data. These condition-specific advantages do not establish end-to-end mode as generally optimal for ancient DNA. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 61
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- aar7711 · DOI
- Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
- Authors
- Poullet, M., & Orlando, L.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Orlando, Ludovic
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-05-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 105
- Pages
- 13 pages
- ISSN
- 2296-701X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3022542573
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Université de Toulouse
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- H2020 European Research Council
- Villum Fonden
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
- Keywords
- ancient DNA, DNA methylation, read mapping, Bowtie2, BWA, alignment benchmarking, CpG methylation, genome coverage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review