Cited by 46Aeolian processes and effectsCoastal and Marine DynamicsCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Biomorphogenic Feedbacks and the Spatial Organization of a Dominant Grass Steer Dune Development

Open access
Bonte, Dries, Batsleer, Femke, Provoost, Sam, Reijers, Valérie, Vandegehuchte, Martijn L., Van De Walle, Ruben, Dan, Sebastian, Matheve, Hans +5 more·2021·Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Nature-based solutions to mitigate the impact of future climate change depend on restoring biological diversity and natural processes. Coastal foredunes represent the most important natural flood barriers along coastlines worldwide, but their area has been squeezed dramatically because of a continuing urbanization of coastlines, especially in Europe. Dune development is steered by the development of vegetation in interaction with sand fluxes from the beach. Marram grass ( Calamagrostis arenaria , formerly Ammophila arenaria ) is the main dune building species along most European coasts, but also in other continents where the species was introduced. Engineering of coastal dunes, for instance by building dunes in front of dikes, needs to be based on a solid understanding of the species’ interactions with the environment. Only quantitative approaches enable the further development of mechanistic models and coastal management strategies that encapsulate these biomorphogenic interactions. We here provide a quantitative review of the main biotic and physical interactions that affect marram grass performance, their interactions with sand fluxes and how they eventually shape dune development. Our review highlights that the species’ spatial organization is central to dune development. We further demonstrate this importance by means of remote sensing and a mechanistic model and provide an outlook for further research on the use of coastal dunes as a nature-based solution for coastal protection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fevo.2021.761336

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vegetation development on sandy beaches is influenced by various biophysical factors, including soil moisture, salinity, salt spray, sand burial, and erosion, as well as human activities such as visitor impact.

    “Vegetation development on sandy beaches is influenced by various biophysical factors, including soil moisture, salinity, salt spray, sand burial, and erosion (Bonte et al., 2021), as well as human activities such as visitor impact (Bakhshianlamouki et al., 2023).”

    From Towards integrated management of sandy anthropogenic shores: Developing tools for the exploration of human-natural interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Bonte et al., 2021

    Bonte et al. report that marram-grass germination requires moist conditions and is inhibited by high salinity (Marram Establishment, p. 2); they also describe effects of sand burial (p. 2) and erosion on dune vegetation (Discussion and Outlook, p. 7). The cited portion of the sentence extends these findings about marram grass and coastal dunes to sandy-beach vegetation generally, and our copy does not identify salt spray as a factor. Visitor impact is attributed to a different citation, not Bonte et al. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Arens, S. M., Baas, A. C. W., Van Boxel, J. H., and Kalkman, C. (2001). Influence of reed stem density on foredune development. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 26, 1161-1176. doi: 10.1002/esp.257 · DOI
  2. Bakker, J. P. (1976). Phytogeographical aspects of the vegetation of the outer dunes in the atlantic province of Europe. J. Biogeogr. 3:85. doi: 10.2307/3038138 · DOI
  3. Bendoni, M., Georgiou, I., Roelvink, D., and Oumeraci, H. (2019). Numerical modelling of the erosion of marsh boundaries due to wave impact. Coast. Eng. 152:103514. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103514 · DOI
  4. Balachowsky, A., and Mesnil, L. (1935). Les Insectes Nuisibles aux Plantes Cultivées . Paris: Oxford.
  5. Borsje, B. W., van Wesenbeeck, B. K., Dekker, F., Paalvast, P., Bouma, T. J., van Katwijk, M. M., et al. (2011). How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection. Ecol. Eng. 37, 113-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.027 · DOI
  6. Charbonneau, B. R., Wnek, J. P., Langley, J. A., Lee, G., and Balsamo, R. A. (2016). Above vs. belowground plant biomass along a barrier island: implications for dune stabilization. J. Environ. Manag. 182, 126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman. 2016.06.032 · DOI

Authors
Bonte, D., Batsleer, F., Provoost, S., Reijers, V., Vandegehuchte, M. L., Van De Walle, R., Dan, S., Matheve, H., Rauwoens, P., Strypsteen, G., Suzuki, T., Verwaest, T., & Hillaert, J.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Research Institute for Nature and Forest (BE)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Flanders Hydraulics (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Bonte, Dries
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2021-10-11
Volume
9
ISSN
2296-701X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3207517876
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Interreg
  • Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Aeolian processes and effects
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Keywords
marram grass, Calamagrostis arenaria, coastal foredunes, dune development, nature-based solutions, coastal protection, coastal dune restoration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review