Cited by 122Congenital limb and hand anomaliesdental development and anomaliesDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Clinical Genetics of Polydactyly: An Updated Review

Open access
Umair, Muhammad, Ahmad, Farooq, Bilal, Muhammad, Ahmad, Wasim, Alfadhel, Majid·2018·Frontiers in Genetics

Abstract

Polydactyly, also known as hyperdactyly or hexadactyly is the most common hereditary limb anomaly characterized by extra fingers or toes, with various associated morphologic phenotypes as part of a syndrome (syndromic polydactyly) or may occur as a separate event (non-syndromic polydactyly). Broadly, the non-syndromic polydactyly has been classified into three types i.e; preaxial polydactyly (radial), central polydactyly (axial) and postaxial polydactyly (ulnar). Mostly inherited as an autosomal dominant entity with variable penetrance and caused by defects that occur in the anterior-posterior patterning of limb development. In human, to-date at least ten loci and six genes causing non-syndromic polydactyly have been identified, including the ZNF141, GLI3, MIPOL1, IQCE, PITX1, and the GLI1. In the present review, clinical, genetic and molecular characterization of the polydactyly types has been presented including the recent genes and loci identified for non-syndromic polydactyly. This review provides an overview of the complex genetic mechanism underlie polydactyly and might help in genetic counseling and quick molecular diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fgene.2018.00447

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variation in the lengths and number of fingers on human hands results from genetic variation.

    “The variation in the lengths and number of fingers on human hands that results from genetic variation, and there is such variation [14,15], has helped to identify the genes that are involved in constructing human hands in development through the stages from embryo to fetus to neonate.”

    From Genes, Heritability, ‘Race’, and Intelligence: Misapprehensions and Implications (2022) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) identifies extra fingers or toes as a hereditary anomaly and names genes associated with polydactyly, supporting genetic variation in finger number. The paper does not establish that variation in the lengths of human fingers results from genetic variation; a search for finger and digit length did not find that point. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Al-Qattan M. M. (2012). A novel frameshift mutation of the GLI3 gene in a family with broad thumbs with/without big toes, postaxial polydactyly and variable syndactyly of the hands/feet. (Letter). Clin. Genet. 82 502– 504. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01866.x 22428873 · DOI
  2. Al-Qattan M. M. (2018). Zone of polarizing activity regulatory sequence mutations/duplications with preaxial polydactyly and longitudinal preaxial ray deficiency in the phenotype: a review of human cases, animal models, and insights regarding the pathogenesis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018: 1573871. 10.1155/2018/1573871 29651423 PMC5832050 · DOI
  3. Bell J. (1953). “On syndactylies and its association with polydactyly,” in The Treasury of Human Inheritance. London: Cambridge University Press, 30– 50.
  4. Burger E. B. Baas M. Hovius S. E. R. Hoogeboom A. J. M. van Nieuwenhoven C. A. (2018). Preaxial polydactyly of the foot. Acta Orthop. 89 113– 118. 10.1016/j.foot.2010.03.001 28946786 PMC5810818 · DOI
  5. Castilla E. Paz J. Mutchinick O. Munoz E. Giorgiutti E. Gelman Z. (1973). Polydactyly: a genetic study in South America. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 25 405– 412. 4716659 PMC1762440
  6. Castilla E. E. da Graca Dutra M. da Fonseca R. Paz J. E. (1997). Hand and foot postaxial polydactyly: two different traits. Am. J. Med. Genet. 73 48– 54. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19971128)73:1<48::AID-AJMG10>3.0.CO;2-R 9375922 · DOI
  7. Deng H. Tan T. Yuan L. (2015). Advances in the molecular genetics of non-syndromic polydactyly. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 17: e18. 10.1017/erm.2015.18 26515020 · DOI
  8. Furniss D. Critchley P. Giele H. Wilkie A. O. M. (2007). Nonsense-mediated decay and the molecular pathogenesis of mutations in SALL1 and GLI3. Am. J. Med. Genet. 143A, 3150– 3160. 10.1002/ajmg.a.32097 18000979 · DOI
  9. Galjaard R. J. Smits A. P. Tuerlings J. H. Bais A. G. Bertoli Avella AM Breedveld G. (2003). A new locus for postaxial polydactyly type A/B on chromosome 7q21-q34. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 11 409– 415. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200982 12734547 · DOI
  10. Graham T. J. Ress A. M. (1998). Finger polydactyly. Hand Clin. 14 49– 64. 9526156
  11. Haas S. L. (1940). Bilateral complete syndactylism of all fingers. Am. J. Surg. 50 363– 366. 10.1016/S0002-9610(40)90631-6 · DOI
  12. Holmes L. B. Nasri H. Hunt A. T. Toufaily M. H. Westgate M. N. (2018). Polydactyly, postaxial, type B. Birth Defects Res. 110 134– 141. 10.1002/bdr2.1184 29377639 · DOI
  13. Hussain M. Glass G. E. Moss A. L. H. (2007). An actively mobile accessory digit arising from the dorsum of the foot: an unusual example of polydactyly. Eur. J. Plast. Surg. 29 381– 383. 10.1007/s00238-007-0114-1 · DOI
  14. Kalsoom U. E. Klopocki E. Wasif N. Tariq M. Khan S. Hecht J. (2013). Whole exome sequencing identified a novel zinc-finger gene ZNF141 associated with autosomal recessive postaxial polydactyly type A. J. Med. Genet. 50 47– 53. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101219 23160277 · DOI
  15. Kerchring T. (1988). “Spicilegium anatomicum continens observationum anatomicarum rariorum centuriam unam necnon osteogeniam foeruum etc,” in Classification of Polydactyly of the Hands and Feet Vol. 107 eds Blauth W. Olason A. T. (Amsterdam: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg), 334– 344. 3240072
  16. Klopocki E. Kähler C. Foulds N. Shah H. Joseph B. Vogel H. (2012). Deletions in PITX1 cause a spectrum of lower-limb malformations including mirror-image polydactyly. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 20 705– 708. 10.1038/ejhg.2011.264 22258522 PMC3355260 · DOI
  17. Kondoh S. Sugawara H. Harada N. Matsumoto N. Ohashi H. Sato M. (2002). A novel gene is disrupted at a 14q13 breakpoint of t (2; 14) in a patient with mirror-image polydactyly of hands and feet. J. Hum. Genet. 47 136– 139. 10.1007/s100380200015 11954550 · DOI
  18. Kucheria K. Kenue R. K. Taneja N. (1981). An Indian family with postaxial polydactyly in four generations. Clin. Genet. 20 36– 39. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1981.tb01803.x 7296946 · DOI
  19. Lange A. Müller G. B. (2017). Polydactyly in development, inheritance, and evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 92 1– 38. 10.1086/690841 29558608 · DOI
  20. Lettice L. A. Horikoshi T. Heaney S. J. van Baren MJ van der Linde HC Breedveld G. J. (2002). Disruption of a long-range cis-acting regulator for Shh causes preaxial polydactyly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 7548– 7553. 10.1073/pnas.112212199 12032320 PMC124279 · DOI
  21. Lohan S. Spielmann M. Doelken S. C. Flöttmann R. Muhammad F. Baig S. M. (2014). Microduplications encompassing the Sonic hedgehog limb enhancer ZRS are associated with Haas-type polysyndactyly and Laurin-Sandrow syndrome. Clin. Genet. 86 318– 325. 10.1111/cge.12352 24456159 · DOI
  22. Maas S. A. Fallon J. F. (2004). Isolation of the chicken Lmbr1 coding sequence and characterization of its role during chick limb development. Dev. Dyn. 229 520– 528. 10.1002/dvdy.10502 14991708 · DOI
  23. Maas S. A. Suzuki T. Fallon J. F. (2011). Identification of spontaneous mutations within the long-range limb-specific Sonic hedgehog enhancer (ZRS) that alter Sonic hedgehog expression in the chicken limb mutants oligozeugodactyly and silkie breed. Dev. Dyn. 240 1212– 1222. 10.1002/dvdy.22634 21509895 PMC3464974 · DOI
  24. Malik S. (2012). Syndactyly: phenotypes, genetics and current classification. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 20 817– 824. 10.1038/ejhg.2012.14 22333904 PMC3400728 · DOI
  25. Malik S. (2014). Polydactyly: phenotypes, genetics and classification. Clin. Genet. 85 203– 212. 10.1111/cge.12276 24020795 · DOI
  26. Malik S. Ullah S. Afzal M. Lal K. Haque S. (2014). Clinical and descriptive genetic study of polydactyly a Pakistani experience of 313 cases/families. Clin. Genet. 85 482– 486. 10.1111/cge.12217 23772746 · DOI
  27. Manske M. C. Kennedy C. D. Huang J. I. (2017). Classifications in Brief: the wassel classification for radial polydactyly. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 475 1740– 1746. 10.1007/s11999-016-5068-9 27613532 PMC5406327 · DOI
  28. Martin R. A. Jones M. C. Jones K. L. (1993). Mirror hands and feet with a distinct nasal defect, an autosomal dominant condition. Am. J. Med. Genet. 46 129– 131. 10.1002/ajmg.1320460205 8387244 · DOI
  29. Masuya H. Sezutsu H. Sakuraba Y. Sagai T. Hosoya M. Kaneda H. (2007). A series of ENU-induced single-basem substitutions in a long-range cis-element altering Sonic hedgehog expression in the developing mouse limb bud. Genomics 89 207– 214. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.09.005 17049204 · DOI
  30. Nair S. R. Varghese S. Kumar A. Jose R. M. (2001). A rare case of central polydactyly. Eur. J. Plast. Surg. 24 264– 265. 10.1007/s002380100249 · DOI
  31. Orioli I. M. Castilla E. E. (1999). Thumb/hallux duplication and preaxial polydactyly type I. Am. J. Med. Genet. 82 219– 224. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990129)82:3<219::AID-AJMG5>3.0.CO;2-S 10215544 · DOI
  32. Palencia-Campos A. Ullah A. Nevado J. Yildirim R. Unal E. Ciorraga M. (2017). GLI1 inactivation is associated with developmental phenotypes overlapping with Ellis–Van creveld syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26 4556– 4571. 10.1093/hmg/ddx335 28973407 · DOI
  33. Park K. Kang J. Subedi K. P. Ha J. H. Park C. (2008). Canine polydactyl mutations with heterogeneous origin in the conserved intronic sequence of LMBR1. Genetics 179 2163– 2172. 10.1534/genetics.108.087114 18689889 PMC2516088 · DOI
  34. Perez-Lopez L. M. Gutierrez-de la Iglesia D. Cabrera-Gonzalez M. (2018). Radial Polydactyly. What’s New? Curr. Pediatr. Rev. 14 91– 96. 10.2174/1573396314666180124102012 29366421 · DOI
  35. Potuijt J. W. P. Baas M. Sukenik-Halevy R. Douben H. Nguyen P. Venter D. J. (2018). A point mutation in the pre-ZRS disrupts sonic hedgehog expression in the limb bud and results in triphalangeal thumb-polysyndactyly syndrome. Genet. Med. 10.1038/gim.2018.18 [Epub ahead of print]. 29543231 · DOI
  36. Pérez-Molina J. J. Alfaro-Alfaro N. López-Zermeño M. C. García-Calderón M. A. (1993). Polydactyly in 26,670 consecutive births. The clinical characteristics, prevalence and risk factors. Bol. Med. Hosp. Infant. Mex. 50 803– 808. 8274232
  37. Pusapati G. V. Hughes C. E. Dorn K. V. Zhang D. Sugianto P. Aravind L. (2014). EFCAB7 and IQCE regulate hedgehog signaling by tethering the EVC-EVC2 complex to the base of primary cilia. Dev. Cell 28 483– 496. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.01.021 24582806 PMC4027042 · DOI
  38. Radhakrishna U. Blouin J. L. Mehenni H. Patel U. C. Patel M. N. Solanki J. V. (1997). Mapping one form of autosomal dominant postaxial polydactyly type A to chromosome 7p15-q11.23 by linkage analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60 597– 604. 9042919 PMC1712530
  39. Radhakrishna U. Bornholdt D. Scott H. S. Patel U. C. Rossier C. Engel H. (1999). The phenotypic spectrum of GLI3 morphopathies includes autosomal dominant preaxial polydactyly type-IV and postaxial polydactyly type-A/B; No phenotype prediction from the position of GLI3 mutations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65 645– 655. 10.1086/302557 10441570 PMC1377970 · DOI
  40. Stenson P. D. Mort M. Ball E. V. Evans K. Hayden M. Heywood S. (2017). The human gene mutation database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies. Hum. Genet. 136 665– 677. 10.1007/s00439-017-1779-6 28349240 PMC5429360 · DOI
  41. Swanson A. B. Brown K. S. (1962). Hereditary triphalangeal thumb. J. Hered. 53 259– 265. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a107190 · DOI
  42. Talamillo A. Bastida M. F. Fernandez-Teran M. Ros M. A. (2005). The developing limb and the control of the number of digits. Clin. Genet. 67 143– 153. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2005.00404.x 15679824 · DOI
  43. Temtamy S. A. McKusick V. A. (1978). “Syndactyly,” in The Genetics of Hand Malformations, eds Temtamy S. A. McKusick V. A. (New York, NY: Wiley), 301– 322. 215242
  44. Tsukurov O. Boehmer A. Flynn J. Nicolai J. P. Hamel B. C. Traill S. (1994). A complex bilateral polysyndactyly disease locus maps to chromosome 7q36. Nat. Genet. 6 282– 286. 10.1038/ng0394-282 8012391 · DOI
  45. Umair M. Alhaddad B. Rafique A. Jan A. Haack T. B. Graf E. (2017a). Exome sequencing reveals a novel homozygous splice site variant in the WNT1 gene underlying osteogenesis imperfecta type 3. Pediatr. Res. 82 753– 758. 10.1038/pr.2017.149 28665926 · DOI
  46. Umair M. Eckstein G. Rudolph G. Strom T. Graf E. Hendig D. (2018). Homozygous XYLT2 variants as a cause of spondyloocular syndrome. Clin. Genet. 93 913– 918. 10.1111/cge.13179 29136277 · DOI
  47. Umair M. Shah K. Alhaddad B. Haack T. B. Graf E. Strom T. M. (2017b). Exome sequencing revealed a splice site variant in the IQCE gene underlying post-axial polydactyly type A restricted to lower limb. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 25 960– 965. 10.1038/ejhg.2017.83 28488682 PMC5567151 · DOI
  48. Umm-e-Kalsoom Basit S. Kamran-ul-Hassan Naqvi S. Ansar M. Ahmad W. (2012). Genetic mapping of an autosomal recessive postaxial polydactyly type A to chromosome 13q13.3-q21.2 and screening of the candidate genes. Hum. Genet. 131 415– 422. 10.1007/s00439-011-1085-7 21877132 · DOI
  49. van der Zwaag P. A. Dijkhuizen T. Gerssen-Schoorl K. B. Colijn A. W. Broens P. M. Flapper B. C. (2010). An interstitial duplication of chromosome 13q31.3q32.1 further delineates the critical region for postaxial polydactyly type A2. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 53 45– 49. 10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.11.003 19941983 · DOI
  50. Vortkamp A. Gessler M. Grzeschik K. H. (1991). GLI3 zinc-finger gene interrupted bytranslocations in Greig syndrome families. Nature 352 539– 540. 10.1038/352539a0 1650914 · DOI
  51. Wassel H. D. (1969). The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb. A review. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 64 175– 193. 4894526
  52. Watson B. T. Hennrikus W. L. (1997). Postaxialtype-B polydactyly. prevalence and treatment. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 79 65– 68. 10.2106/00004623-199701000-00007 9010187 · DOI
  53. Wieczorek D. Pawlik B. Li Y. Akarsu N. A. Caliebe A. May K. J. (2010). A specific mutation in the distant sonic hedgehog (SHH) cis-regulator (ZRS) causes Werner mesomelic syndrome (WMS) while complete ZRS duplications underlie Haas type polysyndactyly and preaxial polydactyly (PPD) with or without triphalangeal thumb. Hum. Mutat. 31 81– 89. 10.1002/humu.21142 19847792 · DOI
  54. Winter R. M. Tickle C. (1993). Syndactylies and polydactylies: embryological overview and suggested classification. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 1 96– 100. 10.1159/000472392 7915184 · DOI
  55. Wood V. (1970). Duplication of the index finger. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 52 569– 573. 10.2106/00004623-197052030-00019 4316628 · DOI
  56. Zhao H. Tian Y. Breedveld G. Huang S. Zou Y. Y J. (2002). Postaxial polydactyly type A/B (PAP-A/B) is linked to chromosome 19p13.1-13.2 in a Chinese kindred. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 10 162– 166. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200790 11973619 · DOI
  57. Zhou G. X. Dai L. Zhu J. Miao L. Wang Y. P. Liang J. (2004). Epidemiological analysis of polydactylies in Chinese perinatals. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 35 708– 710. 15460426
  58. Zuidam J. M. Ananta M. Hovius S. E. (2008). Triplicated thumbs a rarity? J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 61 1078– 1084. 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.02.034 17822968 · DOI

Authors
Umair, M., Ahmad, F., Bilal, M., Ahmad, W., & Alfadhel, M.
Affiliations
  • Quaid-i-Azam University (PK)
  • King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA)
Corresponding author
Umair, Muhammad
Venue
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2018-11-06
Volume
9
Pages
447-447
ISSN
1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900263378
Cited by
122
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Congenital limb and hand anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
polydactyly, preaxial polydactyly, central polydactyly, postaxial polydactyly, limb development, autosomal dominant inheritance, Gli3, PITX1, Gli1, genetic loci, molecular diagnosis, genetic counseling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review