The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Diabetes Mellitus With Machine Learning Techniques
Open accessAbstract
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease characterized by hyperglycemia. It may cause many complications. According to the growing morbidity in recent years, in 2040, the world's diabetic patients will reach 642 million, which means that one of the ten adults in the future is suffering from diabetes. There is no doubt that this alarming figure needs great attention. With the rapid development of machine learning, machine learning has been applied to many aspects of medical health. In this study, we used decision tree, random forest and neural network to predict diabetes mellitus. The dataset is the hospital physical examination data in Luzhou, China. It contains 14 attributes. In this study, five-fold cross validation was used to examine the models. In order to verity the universal applicability of the methods, we chose some methods that have the better performance to conduct independent test experiments. We randomly selected 68994 healthy people and diabetic patients' data, respectively as training set. Due to the data unbalance, we randomly extracted 5 times data. And the result is the average of these five experiments. In this study, we used principal component analysis (PCA) and minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) to reduce the dimensionality. The results showed that prediction with random forest could reach the highest accuracy (ACC = 0.8084) when all the attributes were used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Kohavi, R. (1995) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19712698 · Cited by 10,909
Cited by
Safaei, M., Sundararajan, E. A., Driss, M., Boulila, W., & Shapi'i, A. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104754 · Cited by 720
Artificial Intelligence: The Future for Diabetes Care
Ellahham, S. (2020) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.03.033 · Cited by 373
Early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine learning-based prediction models
Kopitar, L., Kocbek, P., Cilar, L., Sheikh, A., & Stiglic, G. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68771-z · Cited by 369
Classification and prediction of diabetes disease using machine learning paradigm
Maniruzzaman, M., Rahman, M. J., Ahammed, B., & Abedin, M. M. (2020) · Health Information Science and Systems · doi:10.1007/s13755-019-0095-z · Cited by 369
Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes using Machine Learning Classification Methods
Tigga, N. P., & Garg, S. (2020) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.336 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Zou, Q., Qu, K., Luo, Y., Yin, D., Ju, Y., & Tang, H.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Genetics
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-11-06
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 515-515
- ISSN
- 1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900329012
- Cited by
- 920
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 80.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Diabetes Mellitus With Machine Learning Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fgene.2018.00515
- The paper
- Zou, Q., Qu, K., Luo, Y., Yin, D., Ju, Y., & Tang, H. (2018). Predicting Diabetes Mellitus With Machine Learning Techniques. Frontiers in Genetics. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.