Cited by 70Genomics and Rare DiseasesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

De novo mutations from whole exome sequencing in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders: From discovery to application

Open access
Wang, Weidi, Corominas, Roser, Lin, Guan Ning·2019·Frontiers in Genetics

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders are a highly disabling and heterogeneous group of developmental and mental disorders, resulting from complex interactions of genetic and environmental risk factors. The nature of multifactorial traits and the presence of comorbidity and polygenicity in these disorders present challenges in both disease risk identification and clinical diagnoses. The genetic component has been firmly established, but the identification of all the causative variants remains elusive. The development of next-generation sequencing, especially whole exome sequencing (WES), has incredibly enriched our knowledge of the precise genetic alterations of human diseases including brain-related disorders. In particular, the extensive usage of WES in research studies has uncovered the important contribution of de novo mutations (DNMs) to these disorders. Trio and quad familial WES are a particularly useful approach to discover DNMs. Here, we review the major WES studies in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders and summarize how genes hit by discovered DNMs are shared among different disorders. Next, we discuss different integrative approaches utilized to interrogate DNMs and to identify biological pathways that may disrupt brain development and shed light on our understanding of the genetic architecture underlying the disorders. At last, we discuss the current state of the transition from research WES to its routine clinical application. This review will assist researchers and clinicians in the interpretation of variants obtained from WES studies, and highlights the need to develop consensus analytical protocols and validated lists of genes appropriate for clinical laboratory analysis to reach the growing demands.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fgene.2019.00258

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pathogenic variants in the same genes are identified in individuals with a variety of different clinically defined brain disorders, including ASD, ID, epilepsy, schizophrenia, and other neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric conditions.

    “It has also become clear that pathogenic variants in the same genes are identified in individuals with a variety of different clinically defined brain disorders, including ASD, intellectual disability (ID), epilepsy, schizophrenia, and other neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric conditions.”

    From Insufficient Evidence for “Autism-Specific” Genes (2020) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 225 · Cited by 70

Authors
Wang, W., Corominas, R., & Lin, G. N.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (ES)
Corresponding author
Lin, Guan Ning
Venue
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2019-04-03
Volume
10
Pages
258-258
ISSN
1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2933097785
Cited by
70
References
225
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81671328, 2017YFC0909200)
  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (ZXWF082101)
  • Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning (1610000043)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
de novo mutations, neurodevelopmental disorders, mental illness, exome sequencing, genetic architecture, brain development, integrative genomics, variant interpretation, polygenicity, comorbidities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review