Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study in U.S. Holstein Cattle

Open access
Jiang, Jicai, Ma, Li, Prakapenka, Dzianis, VanRaden, Paul M., Cole, John B., Da, Yang·2019·Frontiers in Genetics

Abstract

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a powerful approach to identify genomic regions and genetic variants associated with phenotypes. However, only limited mutual confirmation from different studies is available. We conducted a large-scale GWAS using 294,079 first-lactation Holstein cows and identified new additive and dominance effects on five production traits, three fertility traits, and somatic cell score. Four chromosomes had the most significant SNP effects on the five production traits, the 1.42-5.49 Mb region of Chr14 that contains DGAT1 that mostly had positive effects on fat yield and negative effects on milk and protein yields, the 88.07-89.60 Mb region of Chr06 with SLC4A4, GC, NPFFR2 and ADAMTS3 for milk and protein yields, the 30.03-36.67 Mb region of Chr20 with C6 and GHR for milk yield, and the 88.19-88.88 Mb region with ST8SIA1 and ABCC9 as well as the 91.13-94.62 Mb region of Chr05 with MGST1, SLC15A5 and EPS8 for fat yield. For fertility traits, the SNP in GC of Chr06, and the SNPs in the 65.02-69.43 Mb region of Chr01 with COX17, ILDR1 and KALRN had the most significant effects for daughter pregnancy rate and cow conception rate, whereas SNPs in AFF1 of Chr06, the 47.54-52.79 Mb region of Chr07, TSPAN4 of Chr29 and NPAS1 of Chr18 had the most significant effects for heifer conception rate. For somatic cell score, GC of Chr06 and PRLR of Chr20 had the most significant effects. A small number of dominance effects were detected for the production traits with far lower statistical significance than the additive effects and for fertility traits with similar statistical significance as the additive effects. Analysis of allelic effects revealed the presence of uni-allelic, asymmetric and symmetric SNP effects and found the previously reported DGAT1 antagonism was an extreme antagonistic pleiotropy between fat yield and milk and protein yields among all SNPs in this study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fgene.2019.00412

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, J., Ma, L., Prakapenka, D., VanRaden, P. M., Cole, J. B., & Da, Y.
Venue
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2019-05-14
Volume
10
Pages
412-412
ISSN
1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2936556724
Cited by
267
References
39
FWCI
14.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study in U.S. Holstein Cattle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fgene.2019.00412
The paper
Jiang, J., Ma, L., Prakapenka, D., VanRaden, P. M., Cole, J. B., & Da, Y. (2019). A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study in U.S. Holstein Cattle. Frontiers in Genetics. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00412

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.