The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study in U.S. Holstein Cattle
Open accessAbstract
Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a powerful approach to identify genomic regions and genetic variants associated with phenotypes. However, only limited mutual confirmation from different studies is available. We conducted a large-scale GWAS using 294,079 first-lactation Holstein cows and identified new additive and dominance effects on five production traits, three fertility traits, and somatic cell score. Four chromosomes had the most significant SNP effects on the five production traits, the 1.42-5.49 Mb region of Chr14 that contains DGAT1 that mostly had positive effects on fat yield and negative effects on milk and protein yields, the 88.07-89.60 Mb region of Chr06 with SLC4A4, GC, NPFFR2 and ADAMTS3 for milk and protein yields, the 30.03-36.67 Mb region of Chr20 with C6 and GHR for milk yield, and the 88.19-88.88 Mb region with ST8SIA1 and ABCC9 as well as the 91.13-94.62 Mb region of Chr05 with MGST1, SLC15A5 and EPS8 for fat yield. For fertility traits, the SNP in GC of Chr06, and the SNPs in the 65.02-69.43 Mb region of Chr01 with COX17, ILDR1 and KALRN had the most significant effects for daughter pregnancy rate and cow conception rate, whereas SNPs in AFF1 of Chr06, the 47.54-52.79 Mb region of Chr07, TSPAN4 of Chr29 and NPAS1 of Chr18 had the most significant effects for heifer conception rate. For somatic cell score, GC of Chr06 and PRLR of Chr20 had the most significant effects. A small number of dominance effects were detected for the production traits with far lower statistical significance than the additive effects and for fertility traits with similar statistical significance as the additive effects. Analysis of allelic effects revealed the presence of uni-allelic, asymmetric and symmetric SNP effects and found the previously reported DGAT1 antagonism was an extreme antagonistic pleiotropy between fat yield and milk and protein yields among all SNPs in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis
Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2011) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011 · Cited by 8,279
Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies
Kang, H. M., Sul, J. H., Service, S. K., Zaitlen, N. A., Kong, S.-Y., Freimer, N. B., Sabatti, C., & Eskin, E. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.548 · Cited by 2,817
Yengo, L., Sidorenko, J., Kemper, K. E., Zheng, Z., Wood, A. R., Weedon, M. N., Frayling, T. M., Hirschhorn, J., Yang, J., Visscher, P. M., et al. (2018) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy271 · Cited by 2,367
Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S., & Stewart, G. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25753 · Cited by 1,709
Applications of linear models in animal breeding
Henderson, C. R. (1984) · University of Guelph eBooks · Cited by 1,646
Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts
Loh, P.-R., Tucker, G., Bulik-Sullivan, B. K., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Finucane, H. K., Salem, R. M., Chasman, D. I., Ridker, P. M., Neale, B. M., Berger, B., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3190 · Cited by 1,507
Grisart, B., Coppieters, W., Farnir, F., Karim, L., Ford, C., Berzi, P., Cambisano, N., Mni, M., Reid, S., Simon, P., et al. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.224202 · Cited by 965
23andMe Research Team, Nagel, M., Jansen, P. R., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., de Leeuw, C. A., Bryois, J., Savage, J. E., Hammerschlag, A. R., Skene, N. G., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0151-7 · Cited by 799
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Smith, C. A. B., & Falconer, D. S. (1962) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2333514 · Cited by 797
Cole, J. B., Wiggans, G. R., Ma, L., Sonstegard, T. S., Lawlor, T. J., Crooker, B. A., Van Tassell, C. P., Yang, J., Wang, S., Matukumalli, L. K., et al. (2011) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-408 · Cited by 511
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, J., Ma, L., Prakapenka, D., VanRaden, P. M., Cole, J. B., & Da, Y.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Genetics
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-05-14
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 412-412
- ISSN
- 1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2936556724
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 14.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study in U.S. Holstein Cattle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fgene.2019.00412
- The paper
- Jiang, J., Ma, L., Prakapenka, D., VanRaden, P. M., Cole, J. B., & Da, Y. (2019). A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study in U.S. Holstein Cattle. Frontiers in Genetics. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.