Cited by 12CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Chromatin structure and context-dependent sequence features control prime editing efficiency

Open access
Kim, Somang, Yuan, Jimmy B., Woods, Wendy S., Newton, Destry A., Perez-Pinera, Pablo, Song, Jun S.·2023·Frontiers in Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Prime editing (PE) is a highly versatile CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technique. The current constructs, however, have variable efficiency and may require laborious experimental optimization. This study presents statistical models for learning the salient epigenomic and sequence features of target sites modulating the editing efficiency and provides guidelines for designing optimal PEs. We found that both regional constitutive heterochromatin and local nucleosome occlusion of target sites impede editing, while position-specific G/C nucleotides in the primer-binding site (PBS) and reverse transcription (RT) template regions of PE guide RNA (pegRNA) yield high editing efficiency, especially for short PBS designs. The presence of G/C nucleotides was most critical immediately 5' to the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) site for all designs. The effects of different last templated nucleotides were quantified and observed to depend on the length of both PBS and RT templates. Our models found AGG to be the preferred PAM and detected a guanine nucleotide four bases downstream of the PAM to facilitate editing, suggesting a hitherto-unrecognized interaction with Cas9. A neural network interpretation method based on nonextensive statistical mechanics further revealed multi-nucleotide preferences, indicating dependency among several bases across pegRNA. Our work clarifies previous conflicting observations and uncovers context-dependent features important for optimizing PE designs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fgene.2023.1222112

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prime editing provides significant improvements in genome editing by enabling precise DNA modifications-including targeted insertions, deletions, and substitutions-without causing double-strand breaks in plants.

    “Prime editing (PE) provides significant improvements in genome editing by enabling precise DNA modifications—including targeted insertions, deletions, and substitutions—without causing double-strand breaks in plants (Kim et al., 2023; Perroud et al., 2023; Xu Y. et al., 2023).”

    From Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops (2025) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2023

    The Introduction (page not specified) says prime editing can produce all 12 base changes and small insertions and deletions while avoiding DNA double-strand breaks. It does not establish these capabilities specifically in plants, so the plant-specific part of the claim is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prime editors enable precise insertions, deletions, and substitutions.

    “the prime editors enable precise insertions, deletions, and substitutions”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 12

Authors
Kim, S., Yuan, J. B., Woods, W. S., Newton, D. A., Perez-Pinera, P., & Song, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Song, Jun S.
Venue
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2023-06-29
Volume
14
Pages
1222112-1222112
ISSN
1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4382787256
Cited by
12
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01CA163336 R01GM141296)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
prime editing, CRISPR/Cas9, editing efficiency, chromatin structure, heterochromatin, primer binding site, pegRNA design, protospacer adjacent motif, epigenomic features, neural network interpretation, nonextensive statistical mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review