Artificial intelligence in peptide cancer vaccine design: from neoantigen discovery to immunogenicity prediction
Open accessAbstract
Peptide-based cancer vaccines represent a promising immunotherapeutic strategy aimed at inducing tumor-specific immune responses through the targeting of tumor-associated antigens and neoantigens. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing and immunogenomics have accelerated the identification of candidate neoantigens; however, the development of effective peptide vaccines remains limited by challenges related to antigen selection, HLA polymorphism, antigen processing, and variability in immunogenicity. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning and deep learning approaches, has emerged as a transformative tool capable of addressing these limitations through large-scale integration and analysis of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and immunological data. In this review, we summarize the current role of AI across the peptide cancer vaccine development pipeline, from neoantigen discovery and epitope prioritization to prediction of peptide–HLA binding, antigen presentation, and T-cell receptor recognition. We discuss the application of modern computational frameworks, including pan-allelic prediction models, transformer-based architectures, immunopeptidomics-informed learning, and multi-modal AI systems integrating tumor and immune microenvironment data. Furthermore, we examine the clinical translation of personalized neoantigen vaccines, including their combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors and their emerging role in aggressive malignancies such as glioblastoma. Despite substantial progress, significant challenges remain, including high false-positive prediction rates, limited diversity of training datasets, biological complexity of immunogenicity, and regulatory and manufacturing barriers associated with individualized therapies. Continued integration of AI-driven prediction tools with experimental validation and translational immunology will be essential for the development of clinically effective and scalable precision cancer vaccines.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Multimodal deep learning for biomedical data fusion: a review
Stahlschmidt, S. R., Ulfenborg, B., & Synnergren, J. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab569 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Brlek, P., Kolić, J., Bulić, L., Škaro, V., & Primorac, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Zagreb (HR)
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR)
- Algebra Bernays University (HR)
- International Center for Applied Biological Research
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bulić, Luka
- Venue
- Frontiers in Genetics
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2026-07-29
- Volume
- 17
- Pages
- 1875066-1875066
- ISSN
- 1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13461067
- OpenAlex
- W7171525502
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Keywords
- neoantigen discovery, artificial intelligence, antigen processing, T cell receptor recognition, immunopeptidomics, transformer models, tumor immune microenvironment, personalized cancer vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, glioblastoma, precision oncology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review