Cited by 1vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Artificial intelligence in peptide cancer vaccine design: from neoantigen discovery to immunogenicity prediction

Open access
Brlek, Petar, Kolić, Jan, Bulić, Luka, Škaro, Vedrana, Primorac, Dragan·2026·Frontiers in Genetics

Abstract

Peptide-based cancer vaccines represent a promising immunotherapeutic strategy aimed at inducing tumor-specific immune responses through the targeting of tumor-associated antigens and neoantigens. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing and immunogenomics have accelerated the identification of candidate neoantigens; however, the development of effective peptide vaccines remains limited by challenges related to antigen selection, HLA polymorphism, antigen processing, and variability in immunogenicity. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning and deep learning approaches, has emerged as a transformative tool capable of addressing these limitations through large-scale integration and analysis of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and immunological data. In this review, we summarize the current role of AI across the peptide cancer vaccine development pipeline, from neoantigen discovery and epitope prioritization to prediction of peptide–HLA binding, antigen presentation, and T-cell receptor recognition. We discuss the application of modern computational frameworks, including pan-allelic prediction models, transformer-based architectures, immunopeptidomics-informed learning, and multi-modal AI systems integrating tumor and immune microenvironment data. Furthermore, we examine the clinical translation of personalized neoantigen vaccines, including their combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors and their emerging role in aggressive malignancies such as glioblastoma. Despite substantial progress, significant challenges remain, including high false-positive prediction rates, limited diversity of training datasets, biological complexity of immunogenicity, and regulatory and manufacturing barriers associated with individualized therapies. Continued integration of AI-driven prediction tools with experimental validation and translational immunology will be essential for the development of clinically effective and scalable precision cancer vaccines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fgene.2026.1875066

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Brlek, P., Kolić, J., Bulić, L., Škaro, V., & Primorac, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Zagreb (HR)
  • University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR)
  • Algebra Bernays University (HR)
  • International Center for Applied Biological Research
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bulić, Luka
Venue
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2026-07-29
Volume
17
Pages
1875066-1875066
ISSN
1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7171525502
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Directorate for Biological Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
neoantigen discovery, artificial intelligence, antigen processing, T cell receptor recognition, immunopeptidomics, transformer models, tumor immune microenvironment, personalized cancer vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, glioblastoma, precision oncology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review