The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oral Vaccination of Fish – Antigen Preparations, Uptake, and Immune Induction
Open accessAbstract
The oral route offers the most attractive approach of immunization of fish for a number of reasons: the ease of administration of antigens, it is less stressful than parenteral delivery and in principle, it is applicable to small and large sized fish; it also provides a procedure for oral boosting during grow-out periods in cages or ponds. There are, however, not many commercial vaccines available at the moment due to lack of efficacy and challenges associated with production of large quantities of antigens. These are required to stimulate an effective immune response locally and systemically, and need to be protected against degradation before they reach the sites where immune induction occurs. The hostile stomach environment is believed to be particularly important with regard to degradation of antigens in certain species. There is also a poor understanding about the requirements for proper immune induction following oral administration on one side, and the potential for induction of tolerance on the other. To what extent primary immunization via the oral route will elicit both local and systemic responses is not understood in detail. Furthermore, to what extent parenteral delivery will protect mucosal/gut surfaces and vice-versa is also not fully understood. We review the work that has been done on the subject and discuss it in light of recent advances that include mass production of antigens, including the use of plant systems. Different encapsulation techniques that have been developed in the quest to protect antigens against digestive degradation, as well as to target them for appropriate immune induction are also highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Cited by
Progress, challenges and opportunities in fish vaccine development
Adams, A. (2019) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2019.04.066 · Cited by 365
Sustainable aquaculture requires environmental‐friendly treatment strategies for fish diseases
Lieke, T., Meinelt, T., Hoseinifar, S. H., Pan, B., Straus, D. L., & Steinberg, C. E. W. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12365 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Mutoloki, S., Munang’andu, H. M., & Evensen, Ø.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Immunology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2015-10-19
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 519-519
- ISSN
- 1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098065494
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral Vaccination of Fish – Antigen Preparations, Uptake, and Immune Induction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00519
- The paper
- Mutoloki, S., Munang’andu, H. M., & Evensen, Ø. (2015). Oral Vaccination of Fish – Antigen Preparations, Uptake, and Immune Induction. Frontiers in Immunology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.