Cited by 74Influenza Virus Research StudiesCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchImmune responses and vaccinations

Impact of Aging and Cytomegalovirus on Immunological Response to Influenza Vaccination and Infection

Open access
Merani, Shahzma, Pawelec, Graham, Kuchel, George A., McElhaney, Janet E.·2017·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

The number of people over the age of 60 is expected to double by 2050 according to the WHO. This emphasizes the need to ensure optimized resilience to health stressors in late life. In older adults, influenza is one of the leading causes of catastrophic disability (defined as the loss of independence in daily living and self-care activities). Influenza vaccination is generally perceived to be less protective in older adults, with some studies suggesting that the humoral immune response to the vaccine is further impaired in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive older people. CMV is a β-herpes virus infection that is generally asymptomatic in healthy individuals. The majority of older adults possess serum antibodies against the virus indicating latent infection. Age-related changes in T-cell-mediated immunity are augmented by CMV infection and may be associated with more serious complications of influenza infection. This review focuses on the impact of aging and CMV on immune cell function, the response to influenza infection and vaccination, and how the current understanding of aging and CMV can be used to design a more effective influenza vaccine for older adults. It is anticipated that efforts in this field will address the public health need for improved protection against influenza in older adults, particularly with regard to the serious complications leading to loss of independence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00784

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 227 · Cited by 74

Authors
Merani, S., Pawelec, G., Kuchel, G. A., & McElhaney, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Health Sciences North (CA)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
McElhaney, Janet E.
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2017-07-17
Volume
8
Pages
784-784
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2735046224
Cited by
74
References
227
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AG048023, AG021600)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Pa 361/22-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
aging, cytomegalovirus, influenza vaccination, influenza, older adults, immunosenescence, T cell immunity, humoral immune response, vaccine efficacy, vaccine design, loss of independence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review