Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Drone Up! Quantifying Whale Behavior From a New Perspective Improves Observational Capacity

Open access
Torres, Leigh G., Nieukirk, Sharon L., Lemos, Leila, Chandler, Todd E.·2018·Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract

From our traditional boat-based horizontal perspective, marine megafauna behavioral observations are typically limited to animal surfacings. Achieving an aerial perspective has been restricted to brief helicopter or airplane based observations that are costly, noisy and risky. The emergence of commercial small unmanned aerial systems (UAS) has significantly reduced these constraints, and provide a stable, relatively quiet and inexpensive platform that enables replicate observations for prolonged periods with minimal disturbance. The potential of UAS for behavioral observation appears immense, yet quantitative methods of video analysis and proof of utility as an observational tool are required. We use UAS footage of gray whales foraging in coastal waters of Oregon, USA to develop analysis methods, assess behavioral impacts caused by UAS, determine the change in observation time enabled by UAS, and describe unique behaviors observed via UAS. Boat-based behavioral observations from 53 gray whale sightings between May and October 2016 were compared to behavioral data extracted from video analysis of UAS flights during those sightings. We used a DJI Phantom 3 Pro or 4 Advanced, recorded video from an altitude ≥25m, and detected no behavioral response by whales to the UAS. Two experienced whale ethologists conducted UAS video behavioral analysis, including tabulation of whale behavior states and events, and whale surface time and whale visible time (total time the whale was visible including underwater). UAS provided three times more observational capacity than boat-based observations alone (300 vs. 103 minutes). When observation time is accounted for, UAS data provided greater observations of all primary behavior states (travel, forage, social, rest) relative to boat-based data, especially forage, which increased by three times. Furthermore, UAS enable documentation of multiple novel gray whale foraging tactics (e.g., headstands: n=58; side-swimming: n=17; jaw snapping and flexing: n= 10) and 33 social events (nursing, pair coordinated surfacings) not identified in the field. This study demonstrates the significant added value of UAS to marine megafauna behavior and ecological studies. With technological advances, robust study designs, and effective analytical tools, we foresee increased UAS applications to marine megafauna studies to elucidate foraging strategies, habitat associations, social patterns, and response to human disturbance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmars.2018.00319

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Torres, L. G., Nieukirk, S. L., Lemos, L., & Chandler, T. E.
Venue
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2018-09-10
Volume
5
ISSN
2296-7745 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891073780
Cited by
179
References
0
FWCI
11.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drone Up! Quantifying Whale Behavior From a New Perspective Improves Observational Capacity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmars.2018.00319
The paper
Torres, L. G., Nieukirk, S. L., Lemos, L., & Chandler, T. E. (2018). Drone Up! Quantifying Whale Behavior From a New Perspective Improves Observational Capacity. Frontiers in Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00319

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.