Cited by 7Ocean Acidification Effects and ResponsesMarine and coastal ecosystemsPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

Seawater Acidification Exacerbates the Negative Effects of UVR on the Growth of the Bloom-Forming Diatom Skeletonema costatum

Open access
Li, Futian, Li, Hangxiao, Xu, Tianpeng, Li, Shihu, Xu, Juntian·2022·Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract

Climate changes such as seawater acidification caused by rising atmospheric CO 2 and increased ultraviolet radiation (UVR) intensity resulting from shoaling of the upper mixed layer may interact to influence the physiological performance of marine primary producers. But few studies have investigated long-term (>30 days) effects of UVR under seawater acidification conditions, along with less attention on the differential effects of long- and short-wavelength UVA. In the present study, four spectral treatments (>280, >320, >360, and >400 nm) under two pCO 2 levels (400 and 1,000 μatm) were set to investigate the interactive effects of seawater acidification and UVR on the bloom-forming diatom Skeletonema costatum . The results showed that UVR decreased growth and effective quantum yield of Photosystem II (PSII) by 9%–16% and 11%–24%, respectively, but it enhanced cell sizes significantly. Long- and short-wavelength UVA showed differential effects on cell volume and the effective quantum yield of PSII, especially at the elevated CO 2 level. Generally, seawater acidification depressed the effective quantum yield of PSII and cell volume by 6%–18% and 8%–39%, respectively. Additionally, the contents of key PSII proteins (D1 and D2) decreased at the elevated CO 2 level. Elevated CO 2 significantly increased the inhibition of UVR on growth in the >280 nm spectral treatment when compared with ambient CO 2 , while it showed no effects in other spectral treatments. Overall, the results indicate that the effects of seawater acidification on the ubiquitous diatom are light wavelength-dependent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmars.2022.905255

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, F., Li, H., Xu, T., Li, S., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
  • Jiangsu Ocean University (CN)
  • Ministry of Natural Resources (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Juntian
Venue
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2022-06-02
Volume
9
ISSN
2296-7745 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281750722
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Marine Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
  • Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds
  • Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Keywords
ocean acidification, ultraviolet radiation, Skeletonema costatum, diatom growth, effective quantum yield, photosystem II, UVA, elevated CO2, cell volume, D1 and D2 proteins, climate change, light wavelength dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review