Carbon Aerogels From Softwood Kraft Lignin for High Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes
Open accessAbstract
Porous carbon materials derived from plant biomass offer great promise towards developing sustainable and advanced renewable materials for energy applications. Lignin is as an abundant and renewable aromatic biopolymer with high carbon content and chemical functionality for crosslinking, which make lignin a promising alternative for environmentally-friendly carbon aerogel production. In this study, carbon aerogels were produced using an industrial softwood kraft lignin isolated from renewable forest resources. Crosslinked lignin gels were synthesized using an epoxy compound and converted into carbon aerogels with subsequent sol-gel processing, supercritical drying and pyrolysis steps. The effect of lignin-to-crosslinker ratio on the chemical, physical and structural properties of resulting carbon aerogels were investigated. The bulk density of carbon aerogels increased as the lignin content increased from 56 wt% to 87 wt% and ranged from 0.45 to 0.83 g/cm 3, respectively. FTIR results showed that crosslinked network structure was promoted when the lignin-to-crosslinker ratio was higher, which impacted the porous texture of resulting carbon aerogels as evidenced by SEM analysis. XRD analysis was used to correlate degree of graphitization and lignin content, which impacted the electrical conductivity and ion-charge transfer in carbon electrodes. To evaluate the hierarchical porous structure and determine the BET surface area and pore volume, N 2 and CO 2 gas adsorption experiments were conducted. Carbon aerogels with 81 wt% and 87 wt% lignin had superior structural characteristics, which further improved with surface activation with KOH resulting in 1,609 m 2/g for BET surface area, 0.98 cm 3/g for total pore volume and 0.68 cm 3/g for micropore volume. The electrochemical tests of electrodes assembled from 87 wt% lignin carbonized sample with a specific capacitance of 122 F/g at 1A/g had better performance compared to a commercial activated carbon (74 F/g with 845 m 2/g BET) and resorcinol-formaldehyde based carbon aerogel (61 F/g with 1,071 m 2/g BET area), while maintaining ∼90% of its capacitance after 5,000 charge-discharge cycles. Surface activation of lignin carbon aerogels further boosted the capacitance properties, an outstanding energy density of 3.2 Wh/kg at 209.1 W/kg power density were obtained for the supercapacitor electrodes built from the A-CA-L87 activated carbon aerogel.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biomass has emerged as an important class of precursors for carbon aerogel fabrication, offering abundant, renewable, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective resources.
“biomass (e.g., cellulose, 17 chitosan, 18 lignin, 19,20 and biomass waste.21 ) has emerged as an important class of precursors for carbon aerogel fabrication, offering abundant, renewable, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective resources.”
From Boosting hydrogen production with raspberry-derived carbon aerogels with <i>in situ</i> grown carbon nanotubes (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 51
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Palchoudhury, S., Ramasamy, K., Gupta, R. K., and Gupta, A. (2019). Flexible Supercapacitors: A Materials Perspective. Front. Mater. 5, 83. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmats.2018.00083 (Accessed March 9, 2022). doi:10.3389/fmats.2018.0008310.3389/fmats.2018.00083 · DOI
- ch011 · DOI
- ch26 · DOI
- Authors
- Karaaslan, M. A., Lin, L.-T., Ko, F., & Renneckar, S.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Karaaslan, Muzaffer A.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Materials
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2022-05-05
- Volume
- 9
- ISSN
- 2296-8016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4229016987
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (CRDPJ 529966-18)
- Canada Research Chairs (950-232330)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lignin and Wood Chemistry
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Aerogels and thermal insulation
- Keywords
- carbon aerogels, softwood kraft lignin, supercapacitor electrodes, epoxy crosslinking, sol-gel synthesis, supercritical drying, pyrolysis, hierarchical porous structure, specific capacitance, cycling stability, energy density, biomass-derived carbon, renewable materials, graphitization degree, bulk density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review