Feasibility of using FA and GGBS-derived geopolymer for high liquid limit soil stabilization
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: To improve the comprehensive utilization rate of industrial solid wastes, this study developed geopolymer materials using fly ash ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), sodium silicate, and sodium hydroxide for the stabilization of high liquid limit soil. Method: A series of tests including compaction, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), California bearing ratio (CBR), resilient modulus, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were conducted. The investigation focused on the influence of alkali activator modulus and dosage on the strength of geopolymers. Additionally, the impact of geopolymer dosage on the optimum moisture content (OMC), maximum dry density (MDD), UCS, CBR, and resilient modulus of stabilized soil was examined. Results and discussion: The results indicated that the OMC of the stabilized soil decreased while the MDD increased with increasing geopolymer dosage. The UCS of the stabilized soil significantly improved with the addition of geopolymer, achieving values of 0.52 MPa, 1.68 MPa, 3.25 MPa, and 4.18 MPa at 7 days for geopolymer dosages of 0%, 4%, 8%, and 12%, respectively. Similarly, the CBR of the stabilized soil increased with geopolymer dosage, reaching 1.2%, 3.5%, 6.5%, and 10.5% after 4 days of water immersion for geopolymer dosages of 0%, 4%, 8%, and 12%, respectively. Increasing geopolymer dosage effectively improved the resilient modulus of stabilized soil, but did not affect the stress-dependent behavior of stabilized soil. Increasing confining pressure or decreasing deviatoric stress still resulted in a higher resilient modulus for geopolymer stabilized soil.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Li, C., Tan, G., Weng, H., Shi, J., Li, S., & Xie, J.
- Affiliations
- Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xie, Jianwei
- Venue
- Frontiers in Materials
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-08-06
- Volume
- 12
- ISSN
- 2296-8016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4413002391
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- geopolymer, fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, high liquid limit soil, soil stabilization, alkaline activator, sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, unconfined compressive strength, California bearing ratio, resilient modulus, optimum moisture content, maximum dry density, industrial solid waste utilization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review